Investment Corporation of Dubai v Kerzner International Holdings Limited (LM146Jul18) [2018] ZACT 53 (16 November 2018)
The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction would not substantially prevent or lessen competition in the relevant market for 5-star luxury hotel accommodation in Cape Town, as ICD already exercised effective control over KIHL and the transaction merely increased its shareholding from 94% to 100%. The presence...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] ZACT 53
- Parties
- Applicant: Investment Corporation of Dubai; Respondent: Kerzner International Holdings Limited
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Case Number
- LM146Jul18
- Procedural Posture
- Merger Control / Approval of Proposed Merger
- Outcome
- The proposed transaction is approved unconditionally.
- Judges
- Mondo Mazwai, Medi Mokuena, Anton Roskam
- Legal Topics
- Merger Control, Horizontal Overlap, Public Interest, Market Definition
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Investment Corporation of Dubai
Applicant
Kerzner International Holdings Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Merger Control / Approval of Proposed Merger
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed transaction will substantially prevent or lessen competition in the market for 5-star luxury hotel accommodation in Cape Town.
- 2 Whether the transaction raises any public interest concerns, including employment impacts.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction would not substantially prevent or lessen competition in the relevant market for 5-star luxury hotel accommodation in Cape Town, as ICD already exercised effective control over KIHL and the transaction merely increased its shareholding from 94% to 100%. The presence of other competing hotels in the area further mitigated any potential anti-competitive effects. The Tribunal also determined that there were no negative public interest impacts, particularly regarding employment, as confirmed by both the merging parties and the Commission. SACCAWU's concerns about job losses were addressed through engagement and clarification, and no other...
Court Disposition
The proposed transaction is approved unconditionally.
Orders
- The merger between Investment Corporation of Dubai and Kerzner International Holdings Limited is approved without conditions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
54 paragraphs
COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
Case No: LM146Jul18
In the matter between
The Investment Corporation of Dubai Primary Acquiring Firm
And
Kerzner International Holdings Limited
Primary Target Firm
Panel
: Mondo Mazwai (Presiding Member)
: Medi Mokuena (Tribunal Member)
: Anton Roskam (Tribunal Member)
Heard on
: 26 September 2018
Order Issued on : 3 October 2018
Reasons Issued on : 16 November 2018
REASONS FOR DECISION
Approval
[1] On 1 October 2018, the Competition Tribunal (“Tribunal”) unconditionally approved the proposed transaction involving the Investment Corporation of Dubai (“ICD”) and Kerzner International Holdings Limited (“KIHL”), hereinafter
collectively referred to as the merging parties.
[2] The reasons for the approval of the proposed transaction follow.
Parties to the transaction
Primary Acquiring Firm
[3] ICD is an investment company incorporated in accordance with the laws of Dubai, United Arab Emirates (“Dubai”). ICD is controlled by the government of Dubai. ICD controls a number of entities in South Africa and internationally. ICD and all its subsidiaries are hereinafter referred to as the ‘ICD Group’.
[4] The ICD Group is the investment arm of the government of Dubai. The ICD Group invests in various sectors including the hospitality and leisure sector, and the real estate sector.
Primary Target Firm
[5] KIHL is jointly controlled by ICD and Colony K-Two Investor, LCC (“Colony”).[1] KIHL controls a number of entities globally. In South Africa, KIHL controls the One & Only Resorts (Southern Africa) Pty Ltd
(“OORSA”) and exercises joint control with ICD over the One & Only Hotel in Cape Town Holdings (Pty) Ltd (“OOCT
Holdings”). OOCT Holdings ultimately controls and operates the 5-star luxury hotel, One & Only Hotel Cape Town (“One & Only Hotel”) which is located in Victoria & Alfred (V&A) Waterfront.
[6] KIHL is an international developer of destination resorts and luxury hotels. Through OORSA, KIHL also offers hotel administration to the One & Only Hotel.
Proposed transaction
[7] In terms of the Share Purchase Agreement, the proposed transaction entails ICD - which currently owns 94% of KIHL’s share capital - acquiring the remaining share capital (6%) from Colony, which has negative control by virtue of its shareholding.[2] Post-merger, ICD will exercise sole ownership and control over KIHL.
Impact on competition
[8] The Competition Commission (“Commission”) found a horizontal overlap between the activities of the merging parties in the market for the provision of 5-star luxury hotel accommodation. In identifying the geographical market, the Commission was of the view that the scope should be limited to the greater Cape Town City Centre[3] as competition between graded hotels is local and this particular area is within a 5km radius of the One & Only Hotel; but it did not conclude on the relevant geographical market for reasons below.
[9] The Commission held that the proposed transaction was unlikely to alter the pre- merger market structure since ICD was merely increasing its shareholding from 94% to 100%. Furthermore, there are other 5-star luxury hotels in the Cape Town City Centre that are able to exercise competitive restraints against the merged entity.
[10] Based on the above, the Commission concluded that the proposed transaction was unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in the relevant market. We see no reason to differ from the Commission’s conclusion.
Public interest
[11] The merging parties submitted that the proposed transaction will not have any negative effects on employment. In the same vein, the Commission confirmed that the proposed transaction will not result in any retrenchments or job losses.
[12] The Tribunal noted that the South African Commercial, Catering and Allied Workers Union (“SACCAWU”) indicated that it had not received a copy of the merger filing. The Commission confirmed that since SACCAWU’s letter, it had subsequently sent the non-confidential merger notice to SACCAWU and had engaged SACCAWU on its concerns that the merger would lead to job losses. After clarifying that there would be no job losses, SACCAWU indicated to the Commission that its concerns had been addressed.
[13] The Commission has since provided the Tribunal with the relevant correspondence which only took place after the merger record was
filed with the Tribunal.
[14] The proposed transaction raises no other public interest concerns.
Conclusion
[15] In light of the above, we conclude that the proposed transaction is unlikely to prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. In addition, no other public interest concerns arise from the proposed transaction. Accordingly, we approve the proposed transaction
unconditionally.
Ms Mondo Mazwai
Mrs Medi Mokuena and Mr Anton Roskam concurring
16 November 2018
Date
Tribunal Researcher: Busisiwe Masina
For the merging parties: D Smith of ENSafrica
For the Commission R Ncheche and T Mahlangu
[1] Colony exercises negative control over KIHL.
[2] See Transcript, pg 5
[3] The Cape Town Centre includes the V&A Waterfront.