Iroko Investments (PTY) Ltd v Jane Segole INC (2787/2017) [2022] ZAGPJHC 806 (18 October 2022)

Iroko Investments (PTY) Ltd v Jane Segole INC (2787/2017) [2022] ZAGPJHC 806 (18 October 2022)

The court found that there are no compelling reasons for the appeal to be heard by the Supreme Court of Appeal, as there are no matters of principle or law or conflicting judgments regarding the issue considered. The application for leave to appeal was deemed ill-conceived and without reasonable prospects of success. Accordingly, the application was dismissed with costs.

Citation
[2022] ZAGPJHC 806
Parties
Plaintiff: Iroko Investments (PTY) Ltd; Defendant: Jane Segole INC
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
18 October 2022
Case Number
2787/2017
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal to the Full Bench
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Judges
Wepener
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Prospects of Success, Costs Award
Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Prospects of Success Costs Award

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Iroko Investments (PTY) Ltd

Plaintiff

Jane Segole INC

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal to the Full Bench

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether there are compelling reasons for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the application for leave to appeal has reasonable prospects of success.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that there are no compelling reasons for the appeal to be heard by the Supreme Court of Appeal, as there are no matters of principle or law or conflicting judgments regarding the issue considered. The application for leave to appeal was deemed ill-conceived and without reasonable prospects of success. Accordingly, the application was dismissed with costs.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.