Isaac and Others v Tswaing Local Municipality and Others (J221/22) [2022] ZALCJHB 323 (21 November 2022)
The court found that the applicants squandered any urgency by agreeing to a lengthy postponement for settlement discussions, despite being aware of the impending expiry of their fixed-term contracts. The prior judicial finding of urgency did not bind the court indefinitely, especially given the applicants' failure to provide a fresh explanation for urgency as required by law. The applicants did not demonstrate that they would not obtain substantial redress in the normal course. The court emphasized that breach of contract claims in employment do not inherently warrant urgent relief and that the Labour Court should be reluctant to entertain such applications unless exceptional...
- Citation
- [2022] ZALCJHB 323
- Parties
- Applicant: Moruti Manoto Isaac; Applicant: Mogoje Ernest Ramotseki; Applicant: Ndongeni Vashty Khamanyane; Respondent: Tswaing Local Municipality; Respondent: Cllr Tshomarelo Piet Januarie; Respondent: Cllr Motseotata Victor Mogudu; Respondent: Cllr Matshidiso Magaret Moreo; Respondent: Cllr Nozemanga Wilheminah Thwane; Respondent: Cllr Ralebatla Levy Tlhagale; Respondent: Cllr Tebogo Jan Sekgelo; Respondent: Cllr Nkagisang Patrick Moleboge; Respondent: Cllr Gisiame David Gaedie; Respondent: Cllr Shuping Joel Kgatitswe; Respondent: Cllr Jacob Papi Molatudi; Respondent: Cllr Salminah Kedumetse Moleleki; Respondent: Cllr Simane Micheal Williams; Respondent: Cllr Thomas Mpho Sehemo; Respondent: Cllr Puseletso Meriam Mokoto; Respondent: Cllr Mamme Emmah Molete; Respondent: Cllr Nkagisang Joseph Molehabangwe; Respondent: Cllr Soret Viljeon; Respondent: Clr Linda Yvonee Taaljard; Respondent: Cllr Joseph Kagiso Mangwejane; Respondent: Cllr Marlize Alison Callghan; Respondent: Cllr Modisaotsile Andrew Molamuagae; Respondent: Cllr Merriam Mmatlala Moruapheko; Respondent: Cllr Kabelo Petrus Mathibe; Respondent: Cllr Nooinyana Rebecca Baitsumedi; Respondent: Cllr Jurie Botha; Respondent: Cclr Ntombizodwa Norah Mahlangu (the Mayor); Respondent: The Speaker: Cllr Modisaotsile Sam Letlakane; Respondent: MEC for the Department of Cooperative Governance, Human Settlement and Traditional Affairs: Northwest Province
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 21 November 2022
- Case Number
- J221/22
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Application Struck Off Roll for Lack of Urgency
- Outcome
- Application struck off the roll for lack of urgency. No order as to costs.
- Judges
- Nkutha-Nkontwana
- Legal Topics
- Urgent Application, Breach of Contract, Pre Dismissal Hearing, Fixed Term Employment, Joinder, Unlawful Dismissal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Moruti Manoto Isaac
Applicant
Mogoje Ernest Ramotseki
Applicant
Ndongeni Vashty Khamanyane
Applicant
Tswaing Local Municipality
Respondent
Cllr Tshomarelo Piet Januarie
Respondent
Cllr Motseotata Victor Mogudu
Respondent
Cllr Matshidiso Magaret Moreo
Respondent
Cllr Nozemanga Wilheminah Thwane
Respondent
Cllr Ralebatla Levy Tlhagale
Respondent
Cllr Tebogo Jan Sekgelo
Respondent
Cllr Nkagisang Patrick Moleboge
Respondent
Cllr Gisiame David Gaedie
Respondent
Cllr Shuping Joel Kgatitswe
Respondent
Cllr Jacob Papi Molatudi
Respondent
Cllr Salminah Kedumetse Moleleki
Respondent
Cllr Simane Micheal Williams
Respondent
Cllr Thomas Mpho Sehemo
Respondent
Cllr Puseletso Meriam Mokoto
Respondent
Cllr Mamme Emmah Molete
Respondent
Cllr Nkagisang Joseph Molehabangwe
Respondent
Cllr Soret Viljeon
Respondent
Clr Linda Yvonee Taaljard
Respondent
Cllr Joseph Kagiso Mangwejane
Respondent
Cllr Marlize Alison Callghan
Respondent
Cllr Modisaotsile Andrew Molamuagae
Respondent
Cllr Merriam Mmatlala Moruapheko
Respondent
Cllr Kabelo Petrus Mathibe
Respondent
Cllr Nooinyana Rebecca Baitsumedi
Respondent
Cllr Jurie Botha
Respondent
Cclr Ntombizodwa Norah Mahlangu (the Mayor)
Respondent
The Speaker: Cllr Modisaotsile Sam Letlakane
Respondent
MEC for the Department of Cooperative Governance, Human Settlement and Traditional Affairs: Northwest Province
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application Struck Off Roll for Lack of Urgency
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application remains urgent after significant delay and postponement.
- 2 Whether the applicants are entitled to urgent relief for alleged breach of contract regarding pre-dismissal hearing.
- 3 Whether the issue of urgency is res judicata due to prior judicial pronouncement.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants squandered any urgency by agreeing to a lengthy postponement for settlement discussions, despite being aware of the impending expiry of their fixed-term contracts. The prior judicial finding of urgency did not bind the court indefinitely, especially given the applicants' failure to provide a fresh explanation for urgency as required by law. The applicants did not demonstrate that they would not obtain substantial redress in the normal course. The court emphasized that breach of contract claims in employment do not inherently warrant urgent relief and that the Labour Court should be reluctant to entertain such applications unless exceptional...
Court Disposition
Application struck off the roll for lack of urgency. No order as to costs.
Orders
- The application is struck off the roll for lack of urgency.
- There is no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment