Ithemba Sky Mark Security All Services (Pty) Ltd v Ithemba Sky Mark Security Services Cape Town CC and Another (21535/2022) [2023] ZAGPJHC 772 (20 June 2023)

Ithemba Sky Mark Security All Services (Pty) Ltd v Ithemba Sky Mark Security Services Cape Town CC and Another (21535/2022) [2023] ZAGPJHC 772 (20 June 2023)

The court found that the deed of cession purported to transfer all of the applicant's contracts, which constituted the sole source of income and thus amounted to a disposal of all or the greater part of the applicant's assets or undertaking. No special resolution of shareholders was passed as required by sections 112 and 115 of the Companies Act, rendering the deed invalid. Furthermore, the assignment of both rights and obligations under the contracts required the consent of the clients, which was not obtained. The court held that the deed was not merely a cession of rights but an assignment of obligations, and such a transfer is impermissible without client consent. On these two...

Citation
[2023] ZAGPJHC 772
Parties
Applicant: Ithemba Sky Mark Security All Services (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Ithemba Sky Mark Security Services Cape Town CC; Respondent: Thomas Merrick Perkins
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
20 June 2023
Case Number
21535/2022
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment
Outcome
Application granted; the deed of cession declared null and void ab initio.
Judges
Pearse AJ
Legal Topics
Deed of Cession, Company Asset Disposal, Shareholder Resolution, Delegation of Contractual Obligations, Delectus Personae, Nullity of Contract

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ithemba Sky Mark Security All Services (Pty) Ltd

Applicant

Ithemba Sky Mark Security Services Cape Town CC

Respondent

Thomas Merrick Perkins

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Review Application / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the deed of cession dated 03 December 2020 is null and void ab initio due to lack of authority and absence of client consent.
  2. 2 Whether the transfer of contracts constituted a disposal of all or the greater part of the applicant's assets or undertaking under section 112(2) of the Companies Act, requiring a special resolution.
  3. 3 Whether the assignment of rights and obligations under the contracts required client consent due to delectus personae principles.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the deed of cession purported to transfer all of the applicant's contracts, which constituted the sole source of income and thus amounted to a disposal of all or the greater part of the applicant's assets or undertaking. No special resolution of shareholders was passed as required by sections 112 and 115 of the Companies Act, rendering the deed invalid. Furthermore, the assignment of both rights and obligations under the contracts required the consent of the clients, which was not obtained. The court held that the deed was not merely a cession of rights but an assignment of obligations, and such a transfer is impermissible without client consent. On these two...

Court Disposition

Application granted; the deed of cession declared null and void ab initio.

Orders

  • The deed of cession dated 03 December 2020 between the applicant and first respondent is declared null and void ab initio.
  • The parties are directed to take all lawful, necessary and reasonable steps to safeguard the employment rights and interests of employees of the business before 28 February 2021 and after 01 March 2021.