Jagjiban and Another v Niekerk and Others (1176/2012) [2012] ZAECPEHC 78 (23 October 2012)
The court found that the applicants complied with section 97(1) of the Deeds Registries Act by giving proper notice to the Registrar of Deeds, who responded within the required period. The provision is directory and non-compliance can be condoned. The debt only became due when the applicants paid the full purchase price and requested transfer, which occurred less than three years before the application, so prescription had not commenced. The National Credit Act does not apply to the transaction, and the respondents were correctly cited in both personal and representative capacities. The respondents' points in limine were dismissed as lacking merit, and the applicants were entitled to the...
- Citation
- [2012] ZAECPEHC 78
- Parties
- Applicant: Devan Arthur Jagjiban; Applicant: Angela Jo Anne Jagjiban; Respondent: Rochelle Rhoda Niekerk; Respondent: Rochelle Rhoda Niekerk N O; Respondent: Lee Niekerk; Respondent: Terri Niekerk; Respondent: The Master, Eastern Cape, Port Elizabeth
- Court
- Eastern Cape High Court, Port Elizabeth
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 23 October 2012
- Case Number
- 1176/2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted in terms of paragraphs 1-4 of the Notice of Motion as amended. Respondents to pay costs jointly and severally.
- Judges
- PW Tshiki
- Legal Topics
- Transfer of Immovable Property, Deeds Registries Act Compliance, Prescription Act, Specific Performance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Devan Arthur Jagjiban
Applicant
Angela Jo Anne Jagjiban
Applicant
Rochelle Rhoda Niekerk
Respondent
Rochelle Rhoda Niekerk N O
Respondent
Lee Niekerk
Respondent
Terri Niekerk
Respondent
The Master, Eastern Cape, Port Elizabeth
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants complied with section 97(1) of the Deeds Registries Act 47 of 1937.
- 2 Whether the applicants' claim has prescribed under the Prescription Act 68 of 1969.
- 3 Whether the National Credit Act 34 of 2005 applies to the transaction.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants complied with section 97(1) of the Deeds Registries Act by giving proper notice to the Registrar of Deeds, who responded within the required period. The provision is directory and non-compliance can be condoned. The debt only became due when the applicants paid the full purchase price and requested transfer, which occurred less than three years before the application, so prescription had not commenced. The National Credit Act does not apply to the transaction, and the respondents were correctly cited in both personal and representative capacities. The respondents' points in limine were dismissed as lacking merit, and the applicants were entitled to the...
Court Disposition
Application granted in terms of paragraphs 1-4 of the Notice of Motion as amended. Respondents to pay costs jointly and severally.
Orders
- The respondents are ordered to sign all documentation necessary to effect registration of transfer of the immovable property at 37 Doreen Crescent, Hillside, Port Elizabeth into the joint names of the applicants.
- On signature of the transfer documents by the respondents, the applicants shall pay R6,670.00 to the respondents' attorneys of record.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment