Jansen Van Vuuren v Sullivan (20254/2012) [2014] ZAGPPHC 886 (3 November 2014)

Jansen Van Vuuren v Sullivan (20254/2012) [2014] ZAGPPHC 886 (3 November 2014)

The court objectively reconsidered the facts and arguments presented in support of the application for leave to appeal. Upon review, the judge was not persuaded that there were reasonable prospects that another court would reach a different conclusion on the facts or the law. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal was dismissed with costs.

Citation
[2014] ZAGPPHC 886
Parties
Applicant: Hermina Elizabeth Jansen Van Vuuren; Respondent: Audrey Sullivan
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
3 November 2014
Case Number
20254/2012
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Judges
TLHAPI V V
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Reasonable Prospects, Costs Order
Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Reasonable Prospects Costs Order

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hermina Elizabeth Jansen Van Vuuren

Applicant

Audrey Sullivan

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether there are reasonable prospects that another court may arrive at a different conclusion on fact or law.
  2. 2 Whether leave to appeal should be granted.

Ratio Decidendi

The court objectively reconsidered the facts and arguments presented in support of the application for leave to appeal. Upon review, the judge was not persuaded that there were reasonable prospects that another court would reach a different conclusion on the facts or the law. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal was dismissed with costs.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.