Jarrett Pech Trust v Department of Water Affairs and Forestry (WT21/09/2006) [2009] ZAWT 20 (23 December 2009)

Jarrett Pech Trust v Department of Water Affairs and Forestry (WT21/09/2006) [2009] ZAWT 20 (23 December 2009)

The Tribunal found that the appellant's essential oils operation, specifically the planting and cultivation of Eucalyptus Smithii trees for leaf and oil extraction, constituted a plantation and therefore a forest under the National Forests Act. This classification rendered the activity a stream flow reduction activity under the National Water Act, requiring a water use licence. The Tribunal relied on the definitions provided in the National Forests Act and the expert evidence, including the appellant's own expert's concession, to conclude that the directive issued by the respondent was lawful and should not be set aside. The Tribunal further noted that any request to relax the directive...

Citation
[2009] ZAWT 20
Parties
Appellant: Jarrett Pech Trust; Respondent: Department of Water Affairs and Forestry
Court
Water Tribunal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
23 December 2009
Case Number
WT21/09/2006
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Determination
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; directive upheld.
Judges
L.J Lekale, H Thompson, A.S Makhanya, A.SHadebe
Legal Topics
National Water Act, Stream Flow Reduction Activity, Afforestation, Water Use Licence, National Forests Act
Environmental Law Administrative Law National Water Act Stream Flow Reduction Activity Afforestation Water Use Licence National Forests Act

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jarrett Pech Trust

Appellant

Department of Water Affairs and Forestry

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Final Determination

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant's essential oils operation constitutes a stream flow reduction activity under section 36(1) of the National Water Act.
  2. 2 Whether the appellant's plantation qualifies as a forest or afforestation requiring a water use licence.
  3. 3 Whether the directive issued under section 53 of the Act should be set aside.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the appellant's essential oils operation, specifically the planting and cultivation of Eucalyptus Smithii trees for leaf and oil extraction, constituted a plantation and therefore a forest under the National Forests Act. This classification rendered the activity a stream flow reduction activity under the National Water Act, requiring a water use licence. The Tribunal relied on the definitions provided in the National Forests Act and the expert evidence, including the appellant's own expert's concession, to conclude that the directive issued by the respondent was lawful and should not be set aside. The Tribunal further noted that any request to relax the directive...

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; directive upheld.

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.
  • The directive issued by the Department of Water Affairs and Forestry prevails.