JDJ Properties CC and Another v Umngeni Local Municipality and Another (873/11) [2012] ZASCA 186; [2013] 1 All SA 306 (SCA); 2013 (2) SA 395 (SCA) (29 November 2012)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the municipality's decision to approve the building plans and relax the side space requirement constituted administrative action under PAJA, as it had the capacity to affect the rights of neighbouring landowners and lessees. The appellants, as immediate neighbours and lessees within the same use zone, had sufficient interest and standing to challenge the decision. The court found that no internal remedy was available to the appellants, as the statutory appeals under the Local Government: Municipal Systems Act and the National Building Regulations and Building Standards Act were not applicable to objectors or neighbouring property owners. On the...
- Citation
- [2012] ZASCA 186
- Parties
- Appellant: JDJ Properties CC; Appellant: Double Diamond CC; Respondent: Umngeni Local Municipality; Respondent: Triumph Brokers (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- Supreme Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 29 November 2012
- Case Number
- 873/11
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Kwa Zulu Natal High Court, Pietermaritzburg
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld with costs. The order of the court below is set aside and replaced.
- Judges
- Lewis, Heher, Theron, Pillay, Plasket
- Legal Topics
- Promotion of Administrative Justice Act, Standing to Review, Exhaustion of Internal Remedies, Building Regulations, Town Planning Scheme, Judicial Review
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
JDJ Properties CC
Appellant
Double Diamond CC
Appellant
Umngeni Local Municipality
Respondent
Triumph Brokers (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Kwa Zulu Natal High Court, Pietermaritzburg
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the decision to approve building plans constitutes administrative action under PAJA.
- 2 Whether the appellants have standing to review the municipality's decision.
- 3 Whether internal remedies were available and required to be exhausted before review.
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the municipality's decision to approve the building plans and relax the side space requirement constituted administrative action under PAJA, as it had the capacity to affect the rights of neighbouring landowners and lessees. The appellants, as immediate neighbours and lessees within the same use zone, had sufficient interest and standing to challenge the decision. The court found that no internal remedy was available to the appellants, as the statutory appeals under the Local Government: Municipal Systems Act and the National Building Regulations and Building Standards Act were not applicable to objectors or neighbouring property owners. On the...
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld with costs. The order of the court below is set aside and replaced.
Orders
- The appeal is upheld with costs.
- The decision of the general manager: planning and development services of the first respondent, relaxing the side space requirement in respect of erf 848, Howick, is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment