Jehring and Others v Times Media Group (A279/2017) [2018] ZAWCHC 190 (21 August 2018)

Jehring and Others v Times Media Group (A279/2017) [2018] ZAWCHC 190 (21 August 2018)

The court found that the appellants failed to prove the existence of the expansive oral agreement pleaded as having been concluded on 4 September 2012. The evidence established only a limited interim arrangement for the rollout of 16 kiosks, with Mr Jehring to receive a management fee and certain resources allocated, pending further negotiations. Material terms such as shareholding, funding, and duration were not agreed, and the parties expressly contemplated future negotiation. The respondent's acquisition of Avusa transferred only the limited obligations arising from this interim arrangement, not the broad joint venture alleged. The appellants' challenge to the authenticity of documents...

Citation
[2018] ZAWCHC 190
Parties
Appellant: David Eric Jehring; Appellant: Cold Blue Investments (Pty) Ltd; Appellant: Stax Black Box (Pty) Ltd; Appellant: Stax Property Investments (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Times Media Group (Pty) Ltd
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
21 August 2018
Case Number
A279/2017
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment of Western Cape High Court, Leave Granted by Supreme Court of Appeal
Judges
Bozalek, Boqwana, Savage
Legal Topics
Oral Contracts, Repudiation, Damages for Breach, Joint Venture, Pleadings Precision
Commercial and Corporate Civil Procedure Oral Contracts Repudiation Damages for Breach Joint Venture Pleadings Precision

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

David Eric Jehring

Appellant

Cold Blue Investments (Pty) Ltd

Appellant

Stax Black Box (Pty) Ltd

Appellant

Stax Property Investments (Pty) Ltd

Appellant

Times Media Group (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment of Western Cape High Court, Leave Granted by Supreme Court of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a binding oral agreement was concluded between the appellants and respondent on 4 September 2012.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent repudiated any such agreement and is liable for damages.
  3. 3 Whether the pleadings and evidence established the terms and parties to the alleged agreement.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the appellants failed to prove the existence of the expansive oral agreement pleaded as having been concluded on 4 September 2012. The evidence established only a limited interim arrangement for the rollout of 16 kiosks, with Mr Jehring to receive a management fee and certain resources allocated, pending further negotiations. Material terms such as shareholding, funding, and duration were not agreed, and the parties expressly contemplated future negotiation. The respondent's acquisition of Avusa transferred only the limited obligations arising from this interim arrangement, not the broad joint venture alleged. The appellants' challenge to the authenticity of documents...