Jenkin v Khumbula Media Connexion (Pty) Ltd (D 914/08) [2010] ZALC 78; [2010] 12 BLLR 1295 (LC) (2 June 2010)

Jenkin v Khumbula Media Connexion (Pty) Ltd (D 914/08) [2010] ZALC 78; [2010] 12 BLLR 1295 (LC) (2 June 2010)

The court found that the respondent failed to comply with the procedural requirements of section 189 of the Labour Relations Act, as only one meeting was held and no proper consultation took place. The applicant's evidence established that his employment continued uninterrupted through several changes in ownership, and the respondent did not rebut this with credible evidence or documentation. The facts demonstrated a transfer of the business as a going concern under section 197A, entitling the applicant to severance pay based on his full length of service since 1981. The respondent's dismissal of the applicant was procedurally unfair, and the applicant is entitled to compensation...

Citation
[2010] ZALC 78
Parties
Applicant: Richard Jenkin; Respondent: Khumbula Media Connexion (Pty) Ltd
Court
Labour Court
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
2 June 2010
Case Number
D 914/08
Procedural Posture
Labour Dismissal / Trial Judgment
Outcome
The applicant's dismissal was procedurally unfair. The respondent is ordered to pay the applicant compensation equivalent to eight months' salary and severance pay calculated from his original date of employment. Costs are awarded to the applicant.
Judges
Gush
Legal Topics
Section 197a Transfer, Procedural Fairness, Retrenchment, Severance Pay, Basic Conditions of Employment, Length of Service
Labour Law Section 197a Transfer Procedural Fairness Retrenchment Severance Pay Basic Conditions of Employment Length of Service

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Richard Jenkin

Applicant

Khumbula Media Connexion (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Labour Dismissal / Trial Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Was the applicant's dismissal procedurally fair under section 189 of the Labour Relations Act?
  2. 2 Did the respondent take over the business as a going concern as contemplated by section 197A of the Labour Relations Act?
  3. 3 Is the applicant entitled to severance pay calculated from his original date of employment?

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent failed to comply with the procedural requirements of section 189 of the Labour Relations Act, as only one meeting was held and no proper consultation took place. The applicant's evidence established that his employment continued uninterrupted through several changes in ownership, and the respondent did not rebut this with credible evidence or documentation. The facts demonstrated a transfer of the business as a going concern under section 197A, entitling the applicant to severance pay based on his full length of service since 1981. The respondent's dismissal of the applicant was procedurally unfair, and the applicant is entitled to compensation...

Court Disposition

The applicant's dismissal was procedurally unfair. The respondent is ordered to pay the applicant compensation equivalent to eight months' salary and severance pay calculated from his original date of employment. Costs are awarded to the applicant.

Orders

  • The respondent's dismissal of the applicant was procedurally unfair.
  • The respondent is ordered to pay the applicant compensation equivalent to eight months' salary.