JFM v Mogale City Local Municipality (30195/2020) [2021] ZAGPJHC 570 (15 October 2021)
The court held that the respondent is not entitled to demand payment of municipal debts older than two years for the purposes of issuing a clearance certificate under section 118(1) of the Local Government Municipal Systems Act. The statutory scheme creates a clear embargo: only debts incurred in the two years preceding the application for the certificate are relevant for clearance. The respondent's reliance on a prior settlement agreement and court order does not override the statutory limitation. The applicant complied with the requirements for administrative review, and the respondent's procedural objections are unfounded. The respondent is ordered to issue a revised schedule and...
- Citation
- [2021] ZAGPJHC 570
- Parties
- Applicant: J[....] F[....] M[....]; Respondent: Mogale City Local Municipality
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 15 October 2021
- Case Number
- 30195/2020
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Opposed Motion; Judgment Delivered
- Outcome
- Application granted; respondent ordered to issue revised clearance figures and certificate limited to two years; costs awarded to applicant.
- Judges
- Senyatsi ML
- Legal Topics
- Municipal Rates Clearance, Section 118 Local Government Municipal Systems Act, Administrative Review Under Paja, Historical Debt Limitation, Property Transfer Requirements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
J[....] F[....] M[....]
Applicant
Mogale City Local Municipality
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Opposed Motion; Judgment Delivered
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent is entitled to issue clearance certificate figures including charges beyond the two-year period imposed by section 118(1) of the Local Government Municipal Systems Act.
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to a clearance certificate limited to municipal debts incurred in the two years preceding the application.
- 3 Whether the respondent's reliance on a prior settlement agreement and court order overrides the statutory limitation in section 118(1).
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the respondent is not entitled to demand payment of municipal debts older than two years for the purposes of issuing a clearance certificate under section 118(1) of the Local Government Municipal Systems Act. The statutory scheme creates a clear embargo: only debts incurred in the two years preceding the application for the certificate are relevant for clearance. The respondent's reliance on a prior settlement agreement and court order does not override the statutory limitation. The applicant complied with the requirements for administrative review, and the respondent's procedural objections are unfounded. The respondent is ordered to issue a revised schedule and...
Court Disposition
Application granted; respondent ordered to issue revised clearance figures and certificate limited to two years; costs awarded to applicant.
Orders
- The schedule issued by the respondent to the applicant, Annexure FA8 to the founding affidavit, is reviewed and set aside insofar as it goes beyond the two-year period preceding the application for clearance certificate.
- The respondent is ordered to issue to the applicant a written statement in terms of section 118(1) of the Local Government Municipal Systems Act 32 of 2000, limited to amounts due for municipal property taxes, levies and duties for the two years preceding the date of application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment