J.J.P and Another v J.V (47202/2019) [2020] ZAGPPHC 41 (27 January 2020)
The court found that the first applicant, as biological father, is entitled to full joint parental responsibilities and rights with the respondent, in line with section 21 of the Children's Act and the respondent's concession. The second applicant, as grandmother, failed to establish good cause or satisfy the statutory requirements for parental responsibilities and rights or extensive contact. The court accepted the Family Advocate's interim recommendations for contact arrangements, pending the final report, and declined to grant sleepovers or extensive contact to the second applicant. The best interests of the child, including emotional stability and the need for a final Family Advocate...
- Citation
- [2020] ZAGPPHC 41
- Parties
- Applicant: J.J.P; Applicant: A.P; Respondent: J.V
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 27 January 2020
- Case Number
- 47202/2019
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / First Instance Judgment
- Outcome
- The first applicant is awarded full joint parental responsibilities and rights with the respondent in respect of the minor child. The second applicant's application is dismissed with costs. Contact arrangements for the first applicant are as recommended by the Family Advocate, pending the final report.
- Judges
- Phahlane
- Legal Topics
- Parental Responsibilities and Rights, Best Interests of Child, Contact Rights, Guardianship, Children's Act, Family Advocate Recommendations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
J.J.P
Applicant
A.P
Applicant
J.V
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / First Instance Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the first applicant should be awarded full joint parental responsibilities and rights, including guardianship, in respect of the minor child.
- 2 Whether the second applicant, as grandmother, is entitled to parental responsibilities and rights or extensive contact with the minor child.
- 3 What contact arrangements are in the best interests of the minor child pending the Family Advocate's final report.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the first applicant, as biological father, is entitled to full joint parental responsibilities and rights with the respondent, in line with section 21 of the Children's Act and the respondent's concession. The second applicant, as grandmother, failed to establish good cause or satisfy the statutory requirements for parental responsibilities and rights or extensive contact. The court accepted the Family Advocate's interim recommendations for contact arrangements, pending the final report, and declined to grant sleepovers or extensive contact to the second applicant. The best interests of the child, including emotional stability and the need for a final Family Advocate...
Court Disposition
The first applicant is awarded full joint parental responsibilities and rights with the respondent in respect of the minor child. The second applicant's application is dismissed with costs. Contact arrangements for the first applicant are as recommended by the Family Advocate, pending the final report.
Orders
- The First Applicant is awarded full joint parental responsibilities and rights with the Respondent in respect of the minor child, Jacobus Johannes van Helsdingen, born 12 February 2016.
- Pending the investigation by the Family Advocate, specific parental responsibilities and rights towards care and primary residence are awarded to the Respondent, subject to the following rights of unrestricted contact for the First Applicant: every alternative Saturday from 14:00 to 17:00; every alternative Sunday...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment