J.J.P and Another v J.V (47202/2019) [2020] ZAGPPHC 41 (27 January 2020)

J.J.P and Another v J.V (47202/2019) [2020] ZAGPPHC 41 (27 January 2020)

The court found that the first applicant, as biological father, is entitled to full joint parental responsibilities and rights with the respondent, in line with section 21 of the Children's Act and the respondent's concession. The second applicant, as grandmother, failed to establish good cause or satisfy the statutory requirements for parental responsibilities and rights or extensive contact. The court accepted the Family Advocate's interim recommendations for contact arrangements, pending the final report, and declined to grant sleepovers or extensive contact to the second applicant. The best interests of the child, including emotional stability and the need for a final Family Advocate...

Citation
[2020] ZAGPPHC 41
Parties
Applicant: J.J.P; Applicant: A.P; Respondent: J.V
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
27 January 2020
Case Number
47202/2019
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / First Instance Judgment
Outcome
The first applicant is awarded full joint parental responsibilities and rights with the respondent in respect of the minor child. The second applicant's application is dismissed with costs. Contact arrangements for the first applicant are as recommended by the Family Advocate, pending the final report.
Judges
Phahlane
Legal Topics
Parental Responsibilities and Rights, Best Interests of Child, Contact Rights, Guardianship, Children's Act, Family Advocate Recommendations

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

J.J.P

Applicant

A.P

Applicant

J.V

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Urgent Application / First Instance Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the first applicant should be awarded full joint parental responsibilities and rights, including guardianship, in respect of the minor child.
  2. 2 Whether the second applicant, as grandmother, is entitled to parental responsibilities and rights or extensive contact with the minor child.
  3. 3 What contact arrangements are in the best interests of the minor child pending the Family Advocate's final report.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the first applicant, as biological father, is entitled to full joint parental responsibilities and rights with the respondent, in line with section 21 of the Children's Act and the respondent's concession. The second applicant, as grandmother, failed to establish good cause or satisfy the statutory requirements for parental responsibilities and rights or extensive contact. The court accepted the Family Advocate's interim recommendations for contact arrangements, pending the final report, and declined to grant sleepovers or extensive contact to the second applicant. The best interests of the child, including emotional stability and the need for a final Family Advocate...

Court Disposition

The first applicant is awarded full joint parental responsibilities and rights with the respondent in respect of the minor child. The second applicant's application is dismissed with costs. Contact arrangements for the first applicant are as recommended by the Family Advocate, pending the final report.

Orders

  • The First Applicant is awarded full joint parental responsibilities and rights with the Respondent in respect of the minor child, Jacobus Johannes van Helsdingen, born 12 February 2016.
  • Pending the investigation by the Family Advocate, specific parental responsibilities and rights towards care and primary residence are awarded to the Respondent, subject to the following rights of unrestricted contact for the First Applicant: every alternative Saturday from 14:00 to 17:00; every alternative Sunday...