Johl and Another v Nobre and Others (23841/2010) [2012] ZAWCHC 20 (20 March 2012)
The servitude agreement grants the dominant owner a right of way across the servient property, without any express or implied restrictions on the servient owner's access. The respondents' refusal to provide the applicants with a remote device for the automatic gate constitutes an unlawful restriction and increases the burden on the servient property beyond the terms of the servitude. The respondents' attempt to transform the servitude area into a security buffer for their exclusive use is contrary to the servitude agreement and the principle of civiliter modo. The applicants are entitled to access the servitude area from Gemini Way and to be provided with a remote device for the gate. The...
- Citation
- [2012] ZAWCHC 20
- Parties
- Applicant: Wilfried August Theodore Johl; Applicant: Birthe Benny Margrethe Macun; Respondent: Rui Miguel Rodrigues Nobre; Respondent: Erf 85 Athol Township (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: The City of Cape Town
- Court
- Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 20 March 2012
- Case Number
- 23841/2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Final Interdict
- Outcome
- Application granted. The applicants are entitled to access the servitude area from Gemini Way and to be provided with a remote device for the automatic gate. The respondents are ordered to pay costs on an attorney and client scale, jointly and severally.
- Judges
- Y.S. Meer
- Legal Topics
- Servitude Right of Way, Praedial Servitude, Interpretation of Servitude Agreement, Civiliter Modo, Burden on Servient Property
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wilfried August Theodore Johl
Applicant
Birthe Benny Margrethe Macun
Applicant
Rui Miguel Rodrigues Nobre
Respondent
Erf 85 Athol Township (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
The City of Cape Town
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Final Interdict
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants are entitled to access the servitude area from Gemini Way via the driveway gate.
- 2 Whether the respondents may lawfully restrict the applicants' access to the servitude area by refusing to provide a remote device for the automatic gate.
- 3 Whether the respondents' actions constitute an impermissible increase of the burden on the servient property beyond the terms of the servitude.
Ratio Decidendi
The servitude agreement grants the dominant owner a right of way across the servient property, without any express or implied restrictions on the servient owner's access. The respondents' refusal to provide the applicants with a remote device for the automatic gate constitutes an unlawful restriction and increases the burden on the servient property beyond the terms of the servitude. The respondents' attempt to transform the servitude area into a security buffer for their exclusive use is contrary to the servitude agreement and the principle of civiliter modo. The applicants are entitled to access the servitude area from Gemini Way and to be provided with a remote device for the gate. The...
Court Disposition
Application granted. The applicants are entitled to access the servitude area from Gemini Way and to be provided with a remote device for the automatic gate. The respondents are ordered to pay costs on an attorney and client scale, jointly and severally.
Orders
- The first and second applicants are entitled to access from Gemini Way the portion of Erf 7938, Constantia subject to the servitude right of way in favour of Remainder Erf 7939, Constantia, as depicted by Surveyor General Diagram no. 512/78 and Notarial Deed of Servitude K14/1995S.
- The first and second applicants are entitled to be provided with a remote device to the security gate erected at the entrance to the servitude area on Gemini Way, Constantia.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment