Johncom Media Investments Limited v M and Others (CCT 08/08) [2009] ZACC 5; 2009 (4) SA 7 (CC) ; 2009 (8) BCLR 751 (CC) (17 March 2009)
Section 12 of the Divorce Act 70 of 1979 is unconstitutional because it imposes an absolute prohibition on publication of information arising from divorce proceedings, regardless of whether such publication would harm privacy or children. This blanket restriction is overbroad and disproportionate, failing to balance the right to freedom of expression with the legitimate interests in privacy and dignity. The limitation cannot be justified under section 36 of the Constitution, as less restrictive means—such as prohibiting publication of identities—are available. The entire section is invalid, as the unconstitutional elements cannot be severed. The appropriate remedy is to confirm the...
- Citation
- [2009] ZACC 5
- Parties
- Applicant: Johncom Media Investments Limited; Respondent: M; Respondent: PD; Respondent: Minister for Justice and Constitutional Development; Respondent: Media Monitoring Project
- Court
- Constitutional Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 17 March 2009
- Case Number
- CCT 08/08
- Procedural Posture
- Confirmation of Constitutional Invalidity / Application for Confirmation of High Court Order
- Outcome
- Section 12 of the Divorce Act 70 of 1979 is declared inconsistent with the Constitution and invalid. The High Court's order is confirmed. Publication of the identity of, or information revealing the identity of, any party or child in divorce proceedings is prohibited unless authorised by a court in exceptional...
- Judges
- Jafta AJ, Langa CJ, Kroon AJ, Madala J, Mokgoro J, Nkabinde J, Skweyiya J, Van der Westhuizen J, Yacoob J
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Expression, Privacy and Dignity, Limitation of Rights, Open Justice, Constitutional Invalidity, Publication of Court Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Johncom Media Investments Limited
Applicant
M
Respondent
PD
Respondent
Minister for Justice and Constitutional Development
Respondent
Media Monitoring Project
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Confirmation of Constitutional Invalidity / Application for Confirmation of High Court Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether section 12 of the Divorce Act 70 of 1979 is unconstitutional due to overbreadth and inconsistency with the right to freedom of expression.
- 2 Whether the High Court's order of constitutional invalidity is just and equitable under section 172(1)(b) of the Constitution.
Ratio Decidendi
Section 12 of the Divorce Act 70 of 1979 is unconstitutional because it imposes an absolute prohibition on publication of information arising from divorce proceedings, regardless of whether such publication would harm privacy or children. This blanket restriction is overbroad and disproportionate, failing to balance the right to freedom of expression with the legitimate interests in privacy and dignity. The limitation cannot be justified under section 36 of the Constitution, as less restrictive means—such as prohibiting publication of identities—are available. The entire section is invalid, as the unconstitutional elements cannot be severed. The appropriate remedy is to confirm the...
Court Disposition
Section 12 of the Divorce Act 70 of 1979 is declared inconsistent with the Constitution and invalid. The High Court's order is confirmed. Publication of the identity of, or information revealing the identity of, any party or child in divorce proceedings is prohibited unless authorised by a court in exceptional...
Orders
- The order of the High Court declaring section 12 of the Divorce Act 70 of 1979 inconsistent with the Constitution and invalid is confirmed.
- Subject to court authorisation in exceptional circumstances, publication of the identity of, or information revealing the identity of, any party or child in any divorce proceeding before any court is prohibited.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment