Johnson v Johnson and Others (16626/2023) [2025] ZAWCHC 54 (19 February 2025)
The court found, on a balance of probabilities, that the deceased did not possess the requisite testamentary capacity to execute either the 2015 or 2016 Will. Expert medical evidence, including a MOCA score of 13/30 and psychiatric assessments, established significant cognitive impairment due to moderately advanced dementia. The evidence of Ms Johnson and the unchallenged expert reports corroborated the deceased's inability to appreciate the nature and effect of her actions, recall her assets, or identify her heirs. The suspicious circumstances surrounding the execution of both Wills and the property transfer further supported the inference of incapacity and undue influence. The court...
- Citation
- [2025] ZAWCHC 54
- Parties
- Applicant: Donovan Dennis Johnson; Respondent: Carlo Johnson; Respondent: Bradley Johnson N. O; Respondent: Bradley Johnson; Respondent: Carol Kritzinger; Respondent: Ursula Mostert; Respondent: Robert Mostert; Respondent: Sharifa Mostert; Respondent: Trevor Mostert; Respondent: Gerald Mostert; Respondent: Master of the High Court, Cape Town; Respondent: Registrar of Deeds
- Court
- Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 19 February 2025
- Case Number
- 16626/2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Opposed Application for Declaratory and Ancillary Relief
- Outcome
- Application granted. Both the 2015 and 2016 Wills declared void ab initio. The deceased is deemed to have died intestate. Property transfer to First Respondent set aside. Second Respondent removed as executor. Estate to be administered under intestate succession.
- Judges
- P D Andrews
- Legal Topics
- Testamentary Capacity, Wills Act, Executor Removal, Intestate Succession, Property Transfer Setting Aside, Undue Influence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Donovan Dennis Johnson
Applicant
Carlo Johnson
Respondent
Bradley Johnson N. O
Respondent
Bradley Johnson
Respondent
Carol Kritzinger
Respondent
Ursula Mostert
Respondent
Robert Mostert
Respondent
Sharifa Mostert
Respondent
Trevor Mostert
Respondent
Gerald Mostert
Respondent
Master of the High Court, Cape Town
Respondent
Registrar of Deeds
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Opposed Application for Declaratory and Ancillary Relief
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the deceased had testamentary capacity to execute the 2015 and 2016 Wills.
- 2 Whether the 2015 and 2016 Wills are authentic and valid.
- 3 Whether the transfer of the property to the First Respondent should be set aside.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found, on a balance of probabilities, that the deceased did not possess the requisite testamentary capacity to execute either the 2015 or 2016 Will. Expert medical evidence, including a MOCA score of 13/30 and psychiatric assessments, established significant cognitive impairment due to moderately advanced dementia. The evidence of Ms Johnson and the unchallenged expert reports corroborated the deceased's inability to appreciate the nature and effect of her actions, recall her assets, or identify her heirs. The suspicious circumstances surrounding the execution of both Wills and the property transfer further supported the inference of incapacity and undue influence. The court...
Court Disposition
Application granted. Both the 2015 and 2016 Wills declared void ab initio. The deceased is deemed to have died intestate. Property transfer to First Respondent set aside. Second Respondent removed as executor. Estate to be administered under intestate succession.
Orders
- The Will of Marion Johnson executed on 9 February 2016 is declared null and void.
- The transfer of Erf 1[…] Cape Town to the First Respondent on or about 16 September 2021 is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment