Joni v Association On Mine Workers And Construction Union and Others (JS 413/20) [2021] ZALCJHB 470 (22 November 2021)
The court found that Mr Mathunjwa was not eligible to be elected President of AMCU in September 2019 because he was not an employee as required by the union's constitution and the Labour Relations Act. The alleged practice of retaining office after dismissal was unsupported by evidence and contradicted the constitution. The election was declared unlawful and set aside prospectively from the date of judgment to avoid disruption to the union's operations. Mr Joni lacked locus standi to seek the appointment of an administrator, as only the union or Registrar may do so under section 103A of the LRA. The application against Mr Gama failed due to lack of evidence. The expulsion of Mr Joni and...
- Citation
- [2021] ZALCJHB 470
- Parties
- Applicant: Nkosikho Joni; Respondent: Association On Mine Workers And Construction Union; Respondent: Joseph Mathunjwa N.O.; Respondent: Jimmy Gama N.O.; Respondent: Jeffrey Mphahlele N.O.
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 22 November 2021
- Case Number
- JS 413/20
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment After Hearing on 25 May 2021
- Outcome
- Application partly succeeds: election of Mr Mathunjwa as President set aside prospectively; application against Mr Gama dismissed; remaining prayers dismissed; no costs order.
- Judges
- Mabaso
- Legal Topics
- Trade Union Governance, Locus Standi, Ultra Vires, Appointment of Administrator, Expulsion of Union Member
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nkosikho Joni
Applicant
Association On Mine Workers And Construction Union
Respondent
Joseph Mathunjwa N.O.
Respondent
Jimmy Gama N.O.
Respondent
Jeffrey Mphahlele N.O.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment After Hearing on 25 May 2021
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the election of Mr Mathunjwa as President of AMCU was lawful under the union's constitution and the Labour Relations Act.
- 2 Whether the applicant, Mr Joni, had locus standi to seek the appointment of an administrator for AMCU.
- 3 Whether the expulsion of Mr Joni and the vote of no confidence were procedurally and constitutionally valid.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that Mr Mathunjwa was not eligible to be elected President of AMCU in September 2019 because he was not an employee as required by the union's constitution and the Labour Relations Act. The alleged practice of retaining office after dismissal was unsupported by evidence and contradicted the constitution. The election was declared unlawful and set aside prospectively from the date of judgment to avoid disruption to the union's operations. Mr Joni lacked locus standi to seek the appointment of an administrator, as only the union or Registrar may do so under section 103A of the LRA. The application against Mr Gama failed due to lack of evidence. The expulsion of Mr Joni and...
Court Disposition
Application partly succeeds: election of Mr Mathunjwa as President set aside prospectively; application against Mr Gama dismissed; remaining prayers dismissed; no costs order.
Orders
- The point in limine that the applicant lacks locus standi to seek an order under section 103A of the Labour Relations Act is upheld.
- It is declared that the election of Mr Joseph Mathunjwa as President of AMCU in September 2019 is ultra vires the constitution and the Labour Relations Act, unlawful, unconstitutional and invalid, and is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment