Jonker and Others v Lambons (Pty) Ltd and Another (2769/2017) [2018] ZAFSHC 186 (8 November 2018)
The taxing master erred in preventing the applicants' attorney, who holds a certificate of right of appearance in the high court, from appearing at the taxation. The Practice Directives do not restrict such attorneys to those enrolled in the specific division, and section 4(4) of the Right of Appearance in Courts Act expressly grants attorneys with the requisite certificate the right to appear in all divisions of the high court, including before the taxing master. The taxing master's ruling was based on a misinterpretation of the law and practice, and her conduct in bargaining with the attorney regarding the waiver of review rights further undermined her impartiality. The objections...
- Citation
- [2018] ZAFSHC 186
- Parties
- Applicant: Hannes Marthinus Jonker; Applicant: Hendrik Phillius Fourie Lewis; Applicant: Joseph Ivan Marks; Applicant: Susara Deborah Oberholzer; Applicant: Jabulani Pertrols Mtsweni; Applicant: Gilbert Loftus Rathokolo; Applicant: Samantha Anne Turner; Respondent: Lambons (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Oshene Morobane N.O.
- Court
- Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 8 November 2018
- Case Number
- 2769/2017
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment on Review of Taxing Master's Ruling
- Outcome
- Application for review granted; the taxing master's ruling is set aside and the matter remitted for taxation with costs awarded against the first respondent.
- Judges
- NS Daniso
- Legal Topics
- Right of Appearance, Taxation of Costs, Review of Taxing Master, Practice Directives, Attorneys Act, Costs Award
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hannes Marthinus Jonker
Applicant
Hendrik Phillius Fourie Lewis
Applicant
Joseph Ivan Marks
Applicant
Susara Deborah Oberholzer
Applicant
Jabulani Pertrols Mtsweni
Applicant
Gilbert Loftus Rathokolo
Applicant
Samantha Anne Turner
Applicant
Lambons (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Oshene Morobane N.O.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment on Review of Taxing Master's Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the taxing master erred in preventing the applicants' attorney from appearing at the taxation.
- 2 Whether attorneys with a right of appearance in the high court may appear before the taxing master in any division.
- 3 Whether the taxing master's ruling was based on a misinterpretation of the Practice Directives and relevant statutes.
Ratio Decidendi
The taxing master erred in preventing the applicants' attorney, who holds a certificate of right of appearance in the high court, from appearing at the taxation. The Practice Directives do not restrict such attorneys to those enrolled in the specific division, and section 4(4) of the Right of Appearance in Courts Act expressly grants attorneys with the requisite certificate the right to appear in all divisions of the high court, including before the taxing master. The taxing master's ruling was based on a misinterpretation of the law and practice, and her conduct in bargaining with the attorney regarding the waiver of review rights further undermined her impartiality. The objections...
Court Disposition
Application for review granted; the taxing master's ruling is set aside and the matter remitted for taxation with costs awarded against the first respondent.
Orders
- The ruling of the taxing master preventing the applicants' attorney from appearing at the taxation is set aside.
- It is declared that an attorney with a certificate of right of appearance in terms of section 4(2) of the Right of Appearance in Courts Act is permitted to appear before the taxing master during taxation.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment