Jordaan and Another v National Director of Public Prosecutions and Others (5833/2023; 5325/2023) [2025] ZAMPMBHC 52 (11 June 2025)
The applicants failed to comply with the jurisdictional requirements of sections 26 and 44 of POCA for the release of restrained assets for legal and living expenses. They did not make full and honest disclosure of all assets, including significant property and income in Namibia, and failed to submit sworn and comprehensive statements of assets and liabilities as required by the court orders. The applicants also lacked standing to seek expenses for corporate entities under curatorship. The court found that the applicants did not demonstrate inability to meet expenses from unrestrained property, and their assertions were insufficient and unsupported by evidence. The application was...
- Citation
- [2025] ZAMPMBHC 52
- Parties
- Applicant: Jacobus Hosea Jordaan; Applicant: Elza Jordaan; Respondent: National Director of Public Prosecutions; Respondent: Johan Francois Engelbrecht N.O; Respondent: GNJ Mining (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Joza Logistics (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- Mbombela High Court, Mpumalanga
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 11 June 2025
- Case Number
- 5833/2023; 5325/2023
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Application for Variation of Provisional Preservation and Restraint Orders for Release of Legal and Living Expenses
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs awarded against the applicants.
- Judges
- Moleleki
- Legal Topics
- Prevention of Organised Crime Act, Asset Forfeiture, Full Disclosure, Curatorship, Living Expenses, Legal Expenses
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jacobus Hosea Jordaan
Applicant
Elza Jordaan
Applicant
National Director of Public Prosecutions
Respondent
Johan Francois Engelbrecht N.O
Respondent
GNJ Mining (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Joza Logistics (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application for Variation of Provisional Preservation and Restraint Orders for Release of Legal and Living Expenses
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants have complied with the jurisdictional requirements under sections 26 and 44 of POCA for the release of restrained assets for legal and living expenses.
- 2 Whether the applicants made full and honest disclosure of all assets as required by the provisional restraint and preservation orders.
- 3 Whether the applicants have standing to seek expenses for corporate entities under curatorship.
Ratio Decidendi
The applicants failed to comply with the jurisdictional requirements of sections 26 and 44 of POCA for the release of restrained assets for legal and living expenses. They did not make full and honest disclosure of all assets, including significant property and income in Namibia, and failed to submit sworn and comprehensive statements of assets and liabilities as required by the court orders. The applicants also lacked standing to seek expenses for corporate entities under curatorship. The court found that the applicants did not demonstrate inability to meet expenses from unrestrained property, and their assertions were insufficient and unsupported by evidence. The application was...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs awarded against the applicants.
Orders
- The application is dismissed.
- The applicants are ordered to pay the costs of the application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment