Jordaan v Commission For Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration and Others (P 143/07) [2008] ZALC 54 (25 April 2008)
The court found that the applicant's review application was filed two weeks outside the prescribed six-week period following receipt of the arbitration award. No application for condonation was made, nor were any compelling reasons provided for the delay. The court emphasised that condonation in individual dismissal...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2008] ZALC 54
- Parties
- Applicant: Christina Jacoba Jordaan; Respondent: Commission For Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration; Respondent: Commissioner J Van Der Walt; Respondent: Homenet Cornerstone; Respondent: Cornerstone Homenet; Respondent: Lance Derek Gouws; Respondent: Cornerstone Graphics CC t/a Homenet Cornerstone Beacon Bay; Respondent: Lance Derek Gouws in his capacity as member of Cornerstone Graphics CC Beacon Bay; Respondent: D. T. Gouws Properties CC t/a Homenet Cornerstone; Respondent: t/a Cornerstone Homenet
- Court
- Labour Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 25 April 2008
- Case Number
- P 143/07
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment on Review Application
- Outcome
- Application to review the arbitration award is dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- Cele
- Legal Topics
- Condonation for Late Filing, Constructive Dismissal, Restraint of Trade, Review of Arbitration Award, Operational Requirements, Credibility Assessment
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Christina Jacoba Jordaan
Applicant
Commission For Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration
Respondent
Commissioner J Van Der Walt
Respondent
Homenet Cornerstone
Respondent
Cornerstone Homenet
Respondent
Lance Derek Gouws
Respondent
Cornerstone Graphics CC t/a Homenet Cornerstone Beacon Bay
Respondent
Lance Derek Gouws in his capacity as member of Cornerstone Graphics CC Beacon Bay
Respondent
D. T. Gouws Properties CC t/a Homenet Cornerstone
Respondent
t/a Cornerstone Homenet
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment on Review Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant's review application was filed within the prescribed six-week period under section 145(1)(a) of the Labour Relations Act.
- 2 Whether condonation for late filing should be granted in the absence of a formal application and compelling reasons.
- 3 Whether the commissioner misdirected himself on the facts and law in the arbitration award, particularly regarding the conflict of evidence and credibility findings.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant's review application was filed two weeks outside the prescribed six-week period following receipt of the arbitration award. No application for condonation was made, nor were any compelling reasons provided for the delay. The court emphasised that condonation in individual dismissal disputes is not readily granted and requires a compelling excuse and a cogent case for review. While the applicant may have had grounds to challenge the arbitration award, her failure to apply for condonation and to provide reasons for the late filing was fatal to her application. The court concluded that the identified defect in the arbitration proceedings was not of a kind...
Court Disposition
Application to review the arbitration award is dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The application to review the arbitration award dated 16 February 2007 issued by the second respondent is dismissed.
- The applicant is ordered to pay the costs of this application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment