Joseph v Minister of Police (1379/10) [2012] ZAECPEHC 50 (16 August 2012)

Joseph v Minister of Police (1379/10) [2012] ZAECPEHC 50 (16 August 2012)

The court found that the plaintiff was shot by Constable Disenyane, a member of the police acting within the scope of his duties, and that the shooting was unjustified. The medical evidence irrefutably established that the plaintiff sustained a gunshot wound to the left buttock, contradicting the defendant's denial of injury. The defendant's version was rejected due to inconsistencies and untruthfulness, particularly regarding the circumstances of the shooting and the existence of injuries. The court held that the plaintiff was entitled to damages for pain, suffering, and contumelia, but found the claimed amount excessive given the moderate nature of the injury and lack of lasting...

Citation
[2012] ZAECPEHC 50
Parties
Plaintiff: Leonard Joseph; Defendant: The Minister of Police
Court
Eastern Cape High Court, Port Elizabeth
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
16 August 2012
Case Number
1379/10
Procedural Posture
Civil Action / Trial
Outcome
Plaintiff's claim for damages succeeded; quantum reduced to R70,000.00.
Judges
E Revelas
Legal Topics
Police Assault, General Damages, Contumelia, Quantum of Damages
Delict Civil Procedure Police Assault General Damages Contumelia Quantum of Damages

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Leonard Joseph

Plaintiff

The Minister of Police

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Action / Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff was unlawfully assaulted and shot by a police officer.
  2. 2 Whether the defendant is liable for damages resulting from the shooting.
  3. 3 What is the appropriate quantum for general damages and contumelia.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff was shot by Constable Disenyane, a member of the police acting within the scope of his duties, and that the shooting was unjustified. The medical evidence irrefutably established that the plaintiff sustained a gunshot wound to the left buttock, contradicting the defendant's denial of injury. The defendant's version was rejected due to inconsistencies and untruthfulness, particularly regarding the circumstances of the shooting and the existence of injuries. The court held that the plaintiff was entitled to damages for pain, suffering, and contumelia, but found the claimed amount excessive given the moderate nature of the injury and lack of lasting...

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's claim for damages succeeded; quantum reduced to R70,000.00.

Orders

  • The defendant is to pay damages to the plaintiff in the amount of R70,000.00.
  • Interest at the prescribed rate from fourteen days after judgment to date of payment.