Joycor Enterprises (Pty) Ltd v Draai and Others (2178/18) [2020] ZAECPEHC 15 (28 May 2020)
The court found that the applicant had provided sufficient evidence to prove fulfilment of the suspensive conditions in the sale agreement, including confirmatory affidavits, a detailed letter from Mr Bester, and the founding affidavit of the first and second respondents in the eviction application. The court accepted that Mr Bester, as agent, attorney, and conveyancer for the first and second respondents, was in a position to confirm fulfilment of the conditions. The validity of the sale agreement had already been confirmed in previous proceedings by Mageza AJ, and that finding stands. The respondents' reliance on hearsay and absence of a bank affidavit was not persuasive, given the...
- Citation
- [2020] ZAECPEHC 15
- Parties
- Applicant: Joycor Enterprises (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Benjamin Paul Draai; Respondent: Karen Ann Draai; Respondent: Raynard Vicarto Brass; Respondent: Shereez Gwendolene Brass; Respondent: The Registrar of Deeds, King Williams Town; Respondent: Raynard Vicarto Brass N.O.; Respondent: Shereez Gwendolene Brass N.O.
- Court
- Eastern Cape High Court, Port Elizabeth
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 28 May 2020
- Case Number
- 2178/18
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Judgment and Order Handed Down on 3 March 2020.
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- N Gqamana
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Agreement of Sale, Suspensive Conditions, Onus of Proof, Bona Fide Purchaser
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joycor Enterprises (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Benjamin Paul Draai
Respondent
Karen Ann Draai
Respondent
Raynard Vicarto Brass
Respondent
Shereez Gwendolene Brass
Respondent
The Registrar of Deeds, King Williams Town
Respondent
Raynard Vicarto Brass N.O.
Respondent
Shereez Gwendolene Brass N.O.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Judgment and Order Handed Down on 3 March 2020.
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the suspensive conditions in the sale agreement were fulfilled.
- 2 Whether the applicant discharged the onus of proving fulfilment of the suspensive conditions.
- 3 Whether the Trust was a bona fide purchaser of the property.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had provided sufficient evidence to prove fulfilment of the suspensive conditions in the sale agreement, including confirmatory affidavits, a detailed letter from Mr Bester, and the founding affidavit of the first and second respondents in the eviction application. The court accepted that Mr Bester, as agent, attorney, and conveyancer for the first and second respondents, was in a position to confirm fulfilment of the conditions. The validity of the sale agreement had already been confirmed in previous proceedings by Mageza AJ, and that finding stands. The respondents' reliance on hearsay and absence of a bank affidavit was not persuasive, given the...
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment