JR209 Investments (Pty) Ltd v Zendai Development (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd and Others (LM189Jan17) [2017] ZACT 29; [2017] 1 CPLR 338 (CT) (3 March 2017)

JR209 Investments (Pty) Ltd v Zendai Development (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd and Others (LM189Jan17) [2017] ZACT 29; [2017] 1 CPLR 338 (CT) (3 March 2017)

The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction resulted in a horizontal overlap in the provision of rentable space in retail, office, industrial, and residential property. However, since none of the target properties were fully developed at the time of the transaction, they were not considered competitors in the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] ZACT 29
Parties
Applicant: JR209 Investments (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Zendai Development (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Zendai Investment Management (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Zendai Capital (Pty) Ltd
Court
Competition Tribunal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Case Number
LM189Jan17
Procedural Posture
Merger Control / Tribunal Approval
Outcome
The proposed merger is approved unconditionally.
Judges
Norman Manoim, Yasmin Carrim, Andiswa Ndoni
Legal Topics
Merger Control, Horizontal Overlap, Public Interest, Property Development
Competition Law Commercial and Corporate Merger Control Horizontal Overlap Public Interest Property Development

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

JR209 Investments (Pty) Ltd

Applicant

Zendai Development (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Zendai Investment Management (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Zendai Capital (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Merger Control / Tribunal Approval

  1. 1 Whether the proposed merger will substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market.
  2. 2 Whether the transaction raises any adverse public interest concerns.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction resulted in a horizontal overlap in the provision of rentable space in retail, office, industrial, and residential property. However, since none of the target properties were fully developed at the time of the transaction, they were not considered competitors in the relevant market. Furthermore, there was no geographic overlap between the properties of the acquiring and target groups, as they were located in distinct areas. The Tribunal also considered public interest factors and found no negative impact on employment or other grounds. Consequently, the Tribunal concluded that the merger was unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen...

Court Disposition

The proposed merger is approved unconditionally.

Orders

  • The proposed transaction between JR209 Investments (Pty) Ltd and the Target Firms is approved unconditionally.