Just Names Properties 11 CC and Another v Fourie and Others (324/06) [2007] ZASCA 126; [2007] SCA 126 (RSA); [2008] 2 All SA 487 (SCA); 2008 (1) SA 343 (SCA) (28 September 2007)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the agreement for the sale of immovable property did not comply with section 2(1) of the Alienation of Land Act 68 of 1981 because the sellers signed two blank pages, which were subsequently completed. The Act requires that the deed of alienation be signed by the parties in its...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2007] SCA 126 (RSA)
- Parties
- Appellant: Just Names Properties 11 CC; Appellant: Alexander Baladakis; Respondent: Nicolaas Jacobus Fourie; Respondent: Annie Susan Fourie; Respondent: Chartrade 247 CC; Respondent: Spiros Koutroumanos; Respondent: Kleanthis Maouris; Respondent: Platinum Mile Investments 218 (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Registrar of Deeds, Pretoria
- Court
- Supreme Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 28 September 2007
- Case Number
- 324/06
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Johannesburg High Court; Judgment on Validity of Sale Agreement
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- Brand, Heher, Mhlantla
- Legal Topics
- Alienation of Land Act, Formalities of Contracts, Invalidity of Sale Agreement, Signature Requirements, Counter Offer, Fraud in Contract
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Just Names Properties 11 CC
Appellant
Alexander Baladakis
Appellant
Nicolaas Jacobus Fourie
Respondent
Annie Susan Fourie
Respondent
Chartrade 247 CC
Respondent
Spiros Koutroumanos
Respondent
Kleanthis Maouris
Respondent
Platinum Mile Investments 218 (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Registrar of Deeds, Pretoria
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Johannesburg High Court; Judgment on Validity of Sale Agreement
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the written agreement of sale of immovable property complied with section 2(1) of the Alienation of Land Act 68 of 1981.
- 2 Whether the signing of a blank page by the sellers rendered the agreement invalid.
- 3 Whether the sellers were entitled to repudiate the agreement on the basis of fraud.
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the agreement for the sale of immovable property did not comply with section 2(1) of the Alienation of Land Act 68 of 1981 because the sellers signed two blank pages, which were subsequently completed. The Act requires that the deed of alienation be signed by the parties in its completed form, signifying their assent to the terms as written. The argument that the amendment constituted a counter-offer was rejected, as the evidence showed that the purchaser remained the offeror and the sellers did not make a written counter-offer. The invalidity of the agreement could not be cured by the fact that the amended clause reflected the parties' intention....
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment