K2020704995 (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd v Comair Ltd (In Business Rescue) (LM137Oct20) [2020] ZACT 71 (22 December 2020)
The Tribunal found that the proposed merger would not result in any horizontal or vertical overlap, as Bidco and its shareholders do not compete with Comair or participate in the same supply chain. Therefore, the transaction would not substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. The Tribunal further held that the public interest concerns regarding employment and ownership spread were adequately addressed by the merger conditions, which capped retrenchments at 200 employees, required offers of employment to retrenched staff, and mandated the implementation of a broad-based black economic empowerment initiative and employee share ownership program. The Tribunal...
- Citation
- [2020] ZACT 71
- Parties
- Applicant: K2020704995 (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Comair Ltd (In Business Rescue); Respondent: Competition Commission
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 22 December 2020
- Case Number
- LM137Oct20
- Procedural Posture
- Merger Application / Reasons for Conditional Approval of Merger
- Outcome
- Merger conditionally approved subject to public interest and ownership spread conditions.
- Judges
- Y Carrim, E Daniels, AW Wessels
- Legal Topics
- Merger Control, Public Interest, Broad Based Black Economic Empowerment, Employee Share Ownership Program, Retrenchment, Air Service Licensing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
K2020704995 (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Comair Ltd (In Business Rescue)
Respondent
Competition Commission
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Merger Application / Reasons for Conditional Approval of Merger
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed merger would substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market.
- 2 Whether the merger would have a negative impact on public interest, specifically employment and spread of ownership.
- 3 Whether the conditions attached to the merger adequately address public interest concerns.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the proposed merger would not result in any horizontal or vertical overlap, as Bidco and its shareholders do not compete with Comair or participate in the same supply chain. Therefore, the transaction would not substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. The Tribunal further held that the public interest concerns regarding employment and ownership spread were adequately addressed by the merger conditions, which capped retrenchments at 200 employees, required offers of employment to retrenched staff, and mandated the implementation of a broad-based black economic empowerment initiative and employee share ownership program. The Tribunal...
Court Disposition
Merger conditionally approved subject to public interest and ownership spread conditions.
Orders
- The merger is approved subject to the conditions set out in Annexure A, including capping retrenchments at 200 employees and implementing BBBEE and ESOP initiatives.
- Bidco must make offers of employment to all staff retrenched as a result of the transaction when jobs become available.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment