Download PDF

South Africa Order

Competition Tribunal

K2022877768 (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd v Sants Private Higher Education Institution (Pty) Ltd (LM199Mar23) [2023] ZACT 66 (22 May 2023)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Tribunal, acting on the recommendation of the Competition Commission, found that the proposed merger does not raise competition concerns and complies with the requirements of the Competition Act. Accordingly, the merger is approved under section 16(2)(a) and a Merger Clearance Certificate is to be issued.

Court disposition

Merger approved and clearance certificate ordered.

Orders

  • The merger between K2022877768 (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd and Sants Private Higher Education Institution (Pty) Ltd is approved in terms of section 16(2)(a) of the Competition Act.
  • A Merger Clearance Certificate is to be issued in terms of Competition Tribunal Rule 35(5)(a).

02

Material facts

Parties

K2022877768 (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd

Applicant

Sants Private Higher Education Institution (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Merger Control / Merger Approval Order

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant sought approval for the merger, submitting that the transaction complies with the requirements of the Competition Act and does not substantially prevent or lessen competition.
Respondent
The respondent did not oppose the merger and accepted the recommendation of the Competition Commission for approval.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Competition Act, 1998, section 16(2)(a)

    A merger may be approved if it does not substantially prevent or lessen competition, or if any negative effects are outweighed by public interest considerations.

  2. 02

    Competition Tribunal Rule 35(5)(a)

    The Tribunal must issue a Merger Clearance Certificate upon approval of a merger.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Tribunal, acting on the recommendation of the Competition Commission, found that the proposed merger does not raise competition concerns and complies with the requirements of the Competition Act. Accordingly, the merger is approved under section 16(2)(a) and a Merger Clearance Certificate is to be issued.

Court disposition

Merger approved and clearance certificate ordered.

  • The merger between K2022877768 (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd and Sants Private Higher Education Institution (Pty) Ltd is approved in terms of section 16(2)(a) of the Competition Act.
  • A Merger Clearance Certificate is to be issued in terms of Competition Tribunal Rule 35(5)(a).

Source and reliance status

Competition Tribunal

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Competition Tribunal

Order

[2023] ZACT 66

COMPETITION

TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

Case No.: LM199Mar23

In the matter between:

K2022877768 (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd Primary

Acquiring Firms

And

Sants Private Higher Education

Institution (Pty) Ltd Primary

Target Firm

Panel: T Ngcukaitobi (Presiding Member)

F Tregenna (Tribunal Member)

T Vilakazi (Tribunal Member)

Heard on: 22 May 2023

Decided on: 22 May 2023

ORDER

Further to the recommendation of the Competition Commission in terms of section 14A(1)(b) of the Competition Act, 1998 ("the Act") the Competition Tribunal orders that-

1. the merger between the abovementioned parties be approved in terms of section 16(2)(a) of the Act; and

2. a Merger Clearance Certificate be issued in terms of Competition Tribunal Rule 35(5)(a).

Presiding Member

Adv. Tembeka Ngcukaitobi SC

Concurring: Prof. Fiona Tregenna and Dr. Thando Vilakazi

Date: 22 May 2023

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Competition Act, 1998

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Competition Tribunal Rules

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.