K2023645019 (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd v Clicks Investments (Pty) Ltd and Another (LM206Mar23) [2023] ZACT 49 (2 June 2023)

K2023645019 (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd v Clicks Investments (Pty) Ltd and Another (LM206Mar23) [2023] ZACT 49 (2 June 2023)

The Tribunal found that the proposed merger would not substantially prevent or lessen competition in the relevant markets for healthcare, beauty, and toiletry products, nor in the franchising of beauty salons and retail outlets. However, the Tribunal determined that public interest considerations required the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] ZACT 49
Parties
Applicant: K2023645019 (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Clicks Investments (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Sorbet Holdings (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Aurex Holdings (RF) (Pty) Ltd
Court
Competition Tribunal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Case Number
LM206Mar23
Procedural Posture
Large Merger / Approval With Conditions
Outcome
Merger approved subject to conditions.
Legal Topics
Merger Control, Public Interest Conditions, Employee Share Ownership, Hdp Ownership, Smmes Promotion, Localisation Requirements
Competition Law Commercial and Corporate Merger Control Public Interest Conditions Employee Share Ownership Hdp Ownership Smmes Promotion Localisation Requirements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

K2023645019 (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd

Applicant

Clicks Investments (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Sorbet Holdings (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Aurex Holdings (RF) (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Large Merger / Approval With Conditions

  1. 1 Whether the proposed merger should be approved under the Competition Act.
  2. 2 Whether the transaction promotes a greater spread of ownership by historically disadvantaged persons and SMMEs.
  3. 3 Whether the merger raises any competition concerns in the relevant markets.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the proposed merger would not substantially prevent or lessen competition in the relevant markets for healthcare, beauty, and toiletry products, nor in the franchising of beauty salons and retail outlets. However, the Tribunal determined that public interest considerations required the imposition of conditions to promote a greater spread of ownership by historically disadvantaged persons and SMMEs, support localisation, and establish an employee share ownership programme. The merger was therefore approved subject to these conditions, which were deemed necessary to ensure compliance with the Competition Act's public interest provisions.

Court Disposition

Merger approved subject to conditions.

Orders

  • The proposed merger is approved subject to conditions relating to the promotion of HDP and SMME ownership, localisation, and training.
  • The acquiring parties must establish an employee share ownership programme as a condition of approval.