Kapery v Snyman (3132/17) [2018] ZAECPEHC 66 (13 November 2018)

Kapery v Snyman (3132/17) [2018] ZAECPEHC 66 (13 November 2018)

The court found that the best interests of the children are paramount and that all relevant factors, as set out in the Children’s Act and the Family Advocate’s report, had been considered. The interim order had been implemented without issue for six months, and the children had adapted to the routine. The Family Advocate recommended continued shared parental rights and primary residence with the respondent, with reasonable contact for the applicant. The court held that pending maintenance and eviction proceedings did not preclude granting final relief on care and contact, as any significant change in circumstances could be addressed through mediation or further application. Therefore, the...

Citation
[2018] ZAECPEHC 66
Parties
Applicant: Bashier Kapery; Respondent: Farah Snyman
Court
Eastern Cape High Court, Port Elizabeth
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
13 November 2018
Case Number
3132/17
Procedural Posture
Final Relief Application / Application for Final Relief Following Interim Order
Outcome
Final order granted in favour of the applicant regarding parental rights and responsibilities, with care and contact arrangements as set out in the judgment.
Judges
AH Shene
Legal Topics
Parental Rights and Responsibilities, Care and Contact, Children's Act, Best Interests of Child
Family and Children Parental Rights and Responsibilities Care and Contact Children's Act Best Interests of Child

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bashier Kapery

Applicant

Farah Snyman

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Final Relief Application / Application for Final Relief Following Interim Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to final relief regarding parental rights and responsibilities for the minor children.
  2. 2 Whether the care and contact arrangements should be made final in accordance with the Family Advocate's recommendations.
  3. 3 Whether pending maintenance and eviction proceedings preclude the granting of a final order on care and contact.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the best interests of the children are paramount and that all relevant factors, as set out in the Children’s Act and the Family Advocate’s report, had been considered. The interim order had been implemented without issue for six months, and the children had adapted to the routine. The Family Advocate recommended continued shared parental rights and primary residence with the respondent, with reasonable contact for the applicant. The court held that pending maintenance and eviction proceedings did not preclude granting final relief on care and contact, as any significant change in circumstances could be addressed through mediation or further application. Therefore, the...

Court Disposition

Final order granted in favour of the applicant regarding parental rights and responsibilities, with care and contact arrangements as set out in the judgment.

Orders

  • The applicant has full parental rights and responsibilities in respect of the minor children.
  • The applicant and respondent are co-guardians of the children.