Kashe v Absa Bank and Others (EL260/2014, ECD560/2014) [2014] ZAECELLC 7 (16 September 2014)
The court held that the sale in execution of the estate property was conducted in contravention of section 30 of the Administration of Estates Act 66 of 1965, as neither the executor nor the Master was notified or authorized the sale. The process of service was defective, as the writ was not served on the executor but merely affixed to the deceased’s former residence. The statutory provisions are peremptory, and disregard thereof renders the sale and subsequent actions null and void. Only the executor, with the Master’s approval, may sell estate property, and creditors must prove their claims in accordance with the Act. The actions of the first respondent and the Sheriff were declared...
- Citation
- [2014] ZAECELLC 7
- Parties
- Applicant: Bandile Kashe (Executor for the Estate Late W.M. M.); Respondent: Absa Bank; Respondent: The Sheriff of the High Court, East London; Respondent: Jescan Trading CC; Respondent: Nontsikelelo Ntombikayise Qomfo; Respondent: The Registrar of Deeds, King Williams Town; Respondent: The Master of the High Court, Grahamstown
- Court
- Eastern Cape High Court, East London Local Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 16 September 2014
- Case Number
- EL 260/2014; ECD 560/2014
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Final Judgment on Application to Set Aside Sale in Execution and Related Relief.
- Outcome
- Application granted. Sale in execution set aside. Deed of transfer and mortgage bond cancelled. Costs awarded against first respondent.
- Judges
- P.W. Tshiki
- Legal Topics
- Administration of Estates Act, Sale in Execution, Notice to Executor, Deeds Registries Act, Service of Process, High Court Rule 46
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bandile Kashe (Executor for the Estate Late W.M. M.)
Applicant
Absa Bank
Respondent
The Sheriff of the High Court, East London
Respondent
Jescan Trading CC
Respondent
Nontsikelelo Ntombikayise Qomfo
Respondent
The Registrar of Deeds, King Williams Town
Respondent
The Master of the High Court, Grahamstown
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Final Judgment on Application to Set Aside Sale in Execution and Related Relief.
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sale in execution of estate property without notice to the executor and Master is valid.
- 2 Whether the first respondent and Sheriff complied with section 30 of the Administration of Estates Act 66 of 1965.
- 3 Whether the process of service and attachment was lawfully effected.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the sale in execution of the estate property was conducted in contravention of section 30 of the Administration of Estates Act 66 of 1965, as neither the executor nor the Master was notified or authorized the sale. The process of service was defective, as the writ was not served on the executor but merely affixed to the deceased’s former residence. The statutory provisions are peremptory, and disregard thereof renders the sale and subsequent actions null and void. Only the executor, with the Master’s approval, may sell estate property, and creditors must prove their claims in accordance with the Act. The actions of the first respondent and the Sheriff were declared...
Court Disposition
Application granted. Sale in execution set aside. Deed of transfer and mortgage bond cancelled. Costs awarded against first respondent.
Orders
- The sale in execution of the property is declared null and void.
- The deed of transfer into the name of the third respondent is cancelled in terms of section 6 of the Deeds Registries Act 47 of 1937, if transfer has occurred.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment