Kekana v Railway Safety Regulator (JS468/19) [2021] ZALCJHB 395 (13 October 2021)

Kekana v Railway Safety Regulator (JS468/19) [2021] ZALCJHB 395 (13 October 2021)

The court found that the applicant made protected disclosures regarding procurement irregularities and non-compliance with statutory obligations. The disciplinary charges and subsequent dismissal were temporally and causally linked to these disclosures. The respondent failed to prove that the dismissal was for a legitimate reason unrelated to the disclosures. The court determined that the invented misconduct allegations served as a pretext to conceal the true reason for dismissal, which was the applicant's whistleblowing. The deduction of R7000.00 from the applicant's salary was unlawful as there was no written agreement authorizing the deduction, in breach of section 34(1) of the BCEA....

Citation
[2021] ZALCJHB 395
Parties
Applicant: Solomon Kekana; Respondent: Railway Safety Regulator
Court
Labour Court Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
13 October 2021
Case Number
JS468/19
Procedural Posture
Trial Civil / Final Judgment
Outcome
The applicant's dismissal was declared automatically unfair. The deduction of R7000.00 from his salary was unlawful. The contractual claims for salary adjustment and allowances were dismissed. The applicant was ordered to be reinstated and reimbursed for the deduction. No order as to costs.
Judges
Moshoana
Legal Topics
Automatically Unfair Dismissal, Protected Disclosure, Breach of Employment Contract, Unlawful Salary Deduction, Section 34 Bcea, Reinstatement
Labour Law Civil Procedure Automatically Unfair Dismissal Protected Disclosure Breach of Employment Contract Unlawful Salary Deduction Section 34 Bcea Reinstatement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 27 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Solomon Kekana

Applicant

Railway Safety Regulator

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Trial Civil / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant's dismissal was automatically unfair under section 187(1)(h) of the Labour Relations Act due to making a protected disclosure.
  2. 2 Whether the deduction of R7000.00 from the applicant's salary breached section 34(1) of the Basic Conditions of Employment Act.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant established contractual entitlement to salary adjustments, car allowance, and cellphone allowance.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant made protected disclosures regarding procurement irregularities and non-compliance with statutory obligations. The disciplinary charges and subsequent dismissal were temporally and causally linked to these disclosures. The respondent failed to prove that the dismissal was for a legitimate reason unrelated to the disclosures. The court determined that the invented misconduct allegations served as a pretext to conceal the true reason for dismissal, which was the applicant's whistleblowing. The deduction of R7000.00 from the applicant's salary was unlawful as there was no written agreement authorizing the deduction, in breach of section 34(1) of the BCEA....

Court Disposition

The applicant's dismissal was declared automatically unfair. The deduction of R7000.00 from his salary was unlawful. The contractual claims for salary adjustment and allowances were dismissed. The applicant was ordered to be reinstated and reimbursed for the deduction. No order as to costs.

Orders

  • The dismissal of Kekana is automatically unfair.
  • The deduction of R7000.00 from Kekana's salary is in breach of section 34(1) of the BCEA.