Download PDF

South Africa Judgment

Land Claims Court

Keppler and others v Department of Land Affairs (LCC116/98) [2003] ZALCC 16 (1 July 2003)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court found that, following its earlier judgment which allowed claimants to submit further evidence, Nora Keppler had secured the agreement of all other claimants to accept compensation on their behalf. An agreement was reached between Nora Keppler and the Department of Land Affairs for payment of R43,300.00 in respect of Lot 87, The Highlands. The court, satisfied with the parties' consensus and the sufficiency of evidence now presented, ordered that compensation be paid to Nora Keppler for the dispossession of Lot 87.

Court disposition

Compensation awarded to Nora Keppler for the dispossession of Lot 87, The Highlands.

Orders

  • Compensation of R43,300.00 is awarded to Nora Keppler in respect of the dispossession of Lot 87, The Highlands.

02

Material facts

Parties

N Keppler

Plaintiff Counsel: Ms Marupen

F Jafta

Plaintiff

SJ Keppler

Plaintiff

Department of Land Affairs

Defendant Counsel: Ms Behardien

Amounts and remedies

  • Compensation Awarded: ZAR 43,300

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Civil Procedure / Final Determination of Compensation Claim

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Nora Keppler, having secured the agreement of the other claimants, sought compensation for the dispossession of Lot 87, The Highlands. She argued that she was entitled to receive the compensation on behalf of all claimants, and presented an agreement with the Department of Land Affairs for payment of R43,300.00.
Respondent
The Department of Land Affairs, represented by the State Attorney, agreed to the compensation amount and to Nora Keppler receiving the payment, subject to the court's order.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Restitution of Land Rights Act 22 of 1994

    Claimants must present sufficient evidence to establish their right to claim compensation under the Restitution of Land Rights Act.

  2. 02

    Ex parte former Highland Residents: In re: Ash and Others v Department of Land Affairs [2000] 2 All SA 26 (LCC)

    Where claimants agree, compensation may be paid to a nominated representative acting on their behalf.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court found that, following its earlier judgment which allowed claimants to submit further evidence, Nora Keppler had secured the agreement of all other claimants to accept compensation on their behalf. An agreement was reached between Nora Keppler and the Department of Land Affairs for payment of R43,300.00 in respect of Lot 87, The Highlands. The court, satisfied with the parties' consensus and the sufficiency of evidence now presented, ordered that compensation be paid to Nora Keppler for the dispossession of Lot 87.

Obiter and limits

  • The court notes that the process of restitution under the Act allows for flexibility in the submission of further evidence where initial claims are insufficient.
  • The agreement between the parties facilitated a just and expedient resolution of the compensation claim.

Court disposition

Compensation awarded to Nora Keppler for the dispossession of Lot 87, The Highlands.

  • Compensation of R43,300.00 is awarded to Nora Keppler in respect of the dispossession of Lot 87, The Highlands.

Source and reliance status

Land Claims Court

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Land Claims Court

Judgment

[2003] ZALCC 16

IN

THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA

RANDBURG

CASE NUMBER: LCC 116/98

In chambers: GILDENHUYS J

1 July 2003

In the case between:

KEPPLER, N First Plaintiff

JAFTA, F Second Plaintiff

KEPPLER, SJ Third Plaintiff

and

THE DEPARTMENT OF LAND AFFAIRS Defendant

JUDGMENT

GILDENHUYS J:

On 10 March 2000, I gave judgment on a number of restitution claims brought under the Restitution of Land Rights Act (Act 22 of 1994, as amended) in respect of properties situated in the former township of The Highlands, near Pretoria. The case is reported sub nom Ex parte former Highland Residents: In re: Ash and Others v Department of Land Affairs [2000] 2 All SA 26 (LCC). In my judgment, compensation was awarded to some of the claimants.

Claim no 7 of the aforesaid claims was brought by Joseph Stephanus Keppler and Frederika Keppler in respect of Lot 87, The Highlands. In relation to that claim, I held as follows:

“The claimants did not present sufficient evidence to establish their right to claim; they may apply for leave to submit further evidence.”

Nora Keppler subsequently joined in the action. She secured the agreement of the other claimants to accept (also on their behalf) any compensation which may become due in respect of Lot 87. She then (through her attorney) secured an agreement with the Department of Land Affairs to pay compensation of R43 300.00 in respect of the claim.

At a telephone conference with Ms Marupen (Nora Keppler’s attorney) and Ms Behardien (from the office of the State Attorney, acting on behalf of the Department of Land Affairs) on 30 June 2003, it was agreed that I make the order as set out hereunder. It is ordered as follows: Compensation of R43 300.00 is awarded to Nora Keppler in respect of the dispossession of Lot 87, The Highlands. _______

JUDGE

A GILDENHUYS

At a telephone conference with Ms Marupen (Nora Keppler’s attorney) and Ms Behardien (from the office of the State Attorney, acting on behalf of the Department of Land Affairs) on 30 June 2003, it was agreed that I make the order as set out hereunder.

It is ordered as follows:

Compensation of R43 300.00 is awarded to Nora Keppler in respect of the dispossession of Lot 87, The Highlands.

_______

JUDGE

A GILDENHUYS

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Ex parte former Highland Residents: In re: Ash and Others v Department of Land Affairs [2000] 2 All SA 26 (LCC)

Case cited

Restitution of Land Rights Act 22 of 1994

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.