Kganakga and Another v Chairperson of the North-West Development Tribunal and Others (1004/05) [2006] ZANWHC 10 (19 January 2006)
The court found that the applicants failed to establish urgency, as the decision to develop Kopanong Proper was made in 2000 and the applicants delayed unreasonably in bringing the application. The previous application on similar grounds had been dismissed, and no rescission was sought. The applicants did not exhaust internal remedies by failing to appeal to the Development Appeal Tribunal as required by the Development Facilitation Act. The requirements for an interim interdict were not met: the applicants lacked a prima facie right due to the existing interdict and previous dismissal; there was no well-grounded apprehension of irreparable harm, as compensation for demolished houses was...
- Citation
- [2006] ZANWHC 10
- Parties
- Applicant: Elliot Letlale Kganakga; Applicant: Itsoseng Residents Association; Respondent: Chairperson of the North-West Development Tribunal; Respondent: Department of Development Local Government and Housing North West; Respondent: City of Tshwane Metropolitan Council; Respondent: Rob Taylor and Associates CC; Respondent: Homes 2000 Proprietary Limited
- Court
- North West High Court, Mafikeng
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 19 January 2006
- Case Number
- 1004/05
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Application for Urgent Interim Interdict and Review
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- R D Hendricks
- Legal Topics
- Interim Interdict, Review of Administrative Action, Informal Land Rights, Delay in Review, Exhaustion of Remedies, Compensation for Expropriation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Elliot Letlale Kganakga
Applicant
Itsoseng Residents Association
Applicant
Chairperson of the North-West Development Tribunal
Respondent
Department of Development Local Government and Housing North West
Respondent
City of Tshwane Metropolitan Council
Respondent
Rob Taylor and Associates CC
Respondent
Homes 2000 Proprietary Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application for Urgent Interim Interdict and Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants are entitled to urgent interim relief to suspend development activities on Kopanong Proper pending review.
- 2 Whether the applicants have a prima facie right to the relief sought.
- 3 Whether the application is urgent and whether the delay in bringing the application is justified.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants failed to establish urgency, as the decision to develop Kopanong Proper was made in 2000 and the applicants delayed unreasonably in bringing the application. The previous application on similar grounds had been dismissed, and no rescission was sought. The applicants did not exhaust internal remedies by failing to appeal to the Development Appeal Tribunal as required by the Development Facilitation Act. The requirements for an interim interdict were not met: the applicants lacked a prima facie right due to the existing interdict and previous dismissal; there was no well-grounded apprehension of irreparable harm, as compensation for demolished houses was...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The application is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment