Kgoshikgolo and Another v Commission on Traditional Leadership Dispute and Claims and Others (55035/2012) [2018] ZAGPPHC 969 (28 March 2018)
The court held that the Commission on Traditional Leadership Disputes and Claims was constitutionally and statutorily empowered to investigate and resolve disputes regarding the Bapedi Kingship, including claims previously litigated under pre-constitutional law. The doctrine of res judicata, while promoting finality, cannot be rigidly applied where it would perpetuate injustice or conflict with constitutional imperatives. The Commission's findings regarding the rightful heir to the Bokgosi, the validity of KK Sekhukhune's appointment, and the succession of Victor Thulare were based on a thorough investigation of Bapedi customs and were not barred by previous judicial decisions. The...
- Citation
- [2018] ZAGPPHC 969
- Parties
- Applicant: Kgagudi Kenneth Sekhukhune; Applicant: Mohlaletsi Traditional Authority; Respondent: Commission on Traditional Leadership Disputes and Claims; Respondent: President of the Republic of South Africa; Respondent: Minister of Provincial Affairs and Local Government; Respondent: Thulare Victor Thulare
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 28 March 2018
- Case Number
- 55035/2012
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- Mlambo JP
- Legal Topics
- Promotion of Administrative Justice Act, Customary Law, Traditional Leadership Disputes, Res Judicata, Constitutional Supremacy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kgagudi Kenneth Sekhukhune
Applicant
Mohlaletsi Traditional Authority
Applicant
Commission on Traditional Leadership Disputes and Claims
Respondent
President of the Republic of South Africa
Respondent
Minister of Provincial Affairs and Local Government
Respondent
Thulare Victor Thulare
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Commission on Traditional Leadership Disputes and Claims had the competence to investigate and decide the claims regarding the Bapedi Kingship.
- 2 Whether the doctrine of res judicata barred the Commission from considering the claims previously litigated.
- 3 Whether the Commission's finding that the appointment of KK Sekhukhune as Acting Kgosikgolo was irregular and not in line with Bapedi customs was lawful.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the Commission on Traditional Leadership Disputes and Claims was constitutionally and statutorily empowered to investigate and resolve disputes regarding the Bapedi Kingship, including claims previously litigated under pre-constitutional law. The doctrine of res judicata, while promoting finality, cannot be rigidly applied where it would perpetuate injustice or conflict with constitutional imperatives. The Commission's findings regarding the rightful heir to the Bokgosi, the validity of KK Sekhukhune's appointment, and the succession of Victor Thulare were based on a thorough investigation of Bapedi customs and were not barred by previous judicial decisions. The...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The application is dismissed.
- The applicants are ordered to pay the costs of the Respondents, including the costs occasioned by the employment of two counsel.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment