Download PDF

South Africa Order

North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria

Kgwedi and Others S (A898/2013) [2015] ZAGPPHC 995 (6 November 2015)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court found that there was a misdirection in the original sentencing, specifically regarding the date of sentence and the omission of reference to counts 5 and 6 for accused 1 and 2. The sentences imposed on counts 1, 3 and 4 were set aside and replaced with new sentences. The sentences on counts 5 and 6 for accused 1 and 2 were confirmed. The court ordered that the sentences on counts 3, 4, 5 and 6 for accused 1 and 2, and counts 3 and 4 for accused 3 and 4, shall run concurrently with the sentence on count 1. All sentences were antedated to 20 March 1997.

Court disposition

The appeal against sentence in respect of counts 1, 3 and 4 succeeds; sentences on counts 1, 3 and 4 are set aside and replaced; sentences on counts 5 and 6 for accused 1 and 2 are confirmed; sentences are ordered to run concurrently and antedated to 20 March 1997.

Orders

  • Accused 3's appeal against conviction is dismissed.
  • The appeal against the sentences imposed on the four accused by the court a quo in respect of counts 1, 3 and 4 succeeds.
  • The sentences imposed on the four accused by the court a quo in respect of counts 1, 3 and 4 are set aside and replaced with the following sentences: Accused 1: Count 1 (Murder): 25 years imprisonment; Count 3 (Housebreaking with intent to rob and robbery with aggravating circumstances): 10 years imprisonment; Count 4 (Attempted murder): 10 years imprisonment. Effectively 25 years imprisonment. Accused 2: 35 years imprisonment; Count 3: 15 years imprisonment; Count 4: 15 years imprisonment. Effectively 35 years imprisonment.
  • The sentences on counts 5 and 6 in respect of accused 1 and 2 are confirmed.
  • It is ordered that the sentences on counts 3, 4, 5 and 6 in respect of accused 1 and 2 shall run concurrently with the sentence on count 1.
  • It is ordered that the sentences in respect of counts 3 and 4 in respect of accused 3 and 4 shall run concurrently with the sentence on count 1.
  • The sentences are antedated to 20 March 1997.

02

Material facts

Parties

Alfred Kgwedi

Appellant

Elliot Komani

Appellant

Eddie Baloyi

Appellant

Hermando Sibiya

Appellant

The State

Respondent

Amounts and remedies

  • Accused 1 Count 1 (murder): ZAR 25
  • Accused 1 Count 3 (housebreaking and Robbery): ZAR 10
  • Accused 1 Count 4 (attempted Murder): ZAR 10
  • Accused 2 Total: ZAR 35
  • Accused 2 Count 3: ZAR 15
  • Accused 2 Count 4: ZAR 15

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal Appeal / Correction of Sentence

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The appellants argued that the court a quo misdirected itself in sentencing, specifically regarding the dates and the treatment of counts 5 and 6 for accused 1 and 2. They sought correction of the sentence to reflect the proper antedating and concurrent running of sentences.
Respondent
The respondent conceded the errors identified by the Registrar and agreed that the necessary corrections should be made to the judgment, including the antedating of the sentence and confirmation of sentences on counts 5 and 6 for accused 1 and 2.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    S v Zinn 1969 (2) SA 537 (A)

    The triad in sentencing requires consideration of the crime, the offender, and the interests of society.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court found that there was a misdirection in the original sentencing, specifically regarding the date of sentence and the omission of reference to counts 5 and 6 for accused 1 and 2. The sentences imposed on counts 1, 3 and 4 were set aside and replaced with new sentences. The sentences on counts 5 and 6 for accused 1 and 2 were confirmed. The court ordered that the sentences on counts 3, 4, 5 and 6 for accused 1 and 2, and counts 3 and 4 for accused 3 and 4, shall run concurrently with the sentence on count 1. All sentences were antedated to 20 March 1997.

Obiter and limits

  • The Registrar's attention to detail in identifying errors in the judgment is appreciated.
  • The correction of sentence ensures that justice is properly served and the record accurately reflects the court's intention.

Court disposition

The appeal against sentence in respect of counts 1, 3 and 4 succeeds; sentences on counts 1, 3 and 4 are set aside and replaced; sentences on counts 5 and 6 for accused 1 and 2 are confirmed; sentences are ordered to run concurrently and antedated to 20 March 1997.

  • Accused 3's appeal against conviction is dismissed.
  • The appeal against the sentences imposed on the four accused by the court a quo in respect of counts 1, 3 and 4 succeeds.
  • The sentences imposed on the four accused by the court a quo in respect of counts 1, 3 and 4 are set aside and replaced with the following sentences: Accused 1: Count 1 (Murder): 25 years imprisonment; Count 3 (Housebreaking with intent to rob and robbery with aggravating circumstances): 10 years imprisonment; Count 4 (Attempted murder): 10 years imprisonment. Effectively 25 years imprisonment. Accused 2: 35 years imprisonment; Count 3: 15 years imprisonment; Count 4: 15 years imprisonment. Effectively 35 years imprisonment.
  • The sentences on counts 5 and 6 in respect of accused 1 and 2 are confirmed.
  • It is ordered that the sentences on counts 3, 4, 5 and 6 in respect of accused 1 and 2 shall run concurrently with the sentence on count 1.
  • It is ordered that the sentences in respect of counts 3 and 4 in respect of accused 3 and 4 shall run concurrently with the sentence on count 1.
  • The sentences are antedated to 20 March 1997.

Source and reliance status

North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria

Order

[2015] ZAGPPHC 995

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA /ES

(GAUTENG DIVISION. PRETORIA)

NOT

REPORTABLE

NOT

OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES

CASE NUMBER: A898/2013

DATE:6/11/2015

IN

THE MATIER BETWEEN

1. ALFRED KGWEDI 1st APPELLANT (Accused Iin court a quo)

2. ELLIOT KOMANI 2nd APPELLANT (Accused 2 in court a quo)

3.

EDDIE BALOYI 4th APPELLANT (Accused 3 incourt a quo)

4.

HERMANDO SIBIYA

3rd APPELLANT(Accused 4 incourt a quo)

AND

THE

STATE

RESPONDENT

CORRECTION : SENTENCE

MSIMEKI. J

[1] The Registrar of the court Ms Beena Bhana on 30 October 2015 brought it to my attention that:

1. The date of sentence should have been antedated to 20 March 1997 instead of 19 March 1997. This is indeed correct.

2. Counts 5 and 6 were not referred to in respect of accused 1 and 2. This is also correct. Ithank the Registrar.

[2] The omissions have necessitated the following amendments to the following pantgrapm of my judgment which I handed down on 21 October 2015;

1. Paragraph [47] which should now read:

"The court a quo' s misdirection on sentence means that the appeal against sentence in respect of counts 1, 3 and 4 should succeed while the sentence in respect of counts 5 and 6 which relate to accused 1 and 2 should be confirmed."

2. Paragraph [48] which should now read:

"[48]1. Having had regard to the triad referred to in S v Zinn, supra, and all the factors relevant to sentence I make the following order:

I. Accused 3's appeal against conviction is dismissed.

2. The appeal against the sentences imposed on the four accused by the court a quo in respect of counts I , 3 and

3. The sentences imposed on the four accused by the court a quo in respect of counts 1, 3 and 4 are set aside and replaced with the following sentences:

ACCUSED I

I. COUNT I : MURDER

You are sentenced to 25 years imprisonment.

2. COUNT 3: HOUSEBREAKING WITH THE INTENTION TO ROB AND ROBBERY WITH

AGGRAVATING

CIRCUMSTANCES

You are sentenced to I 0 years imprisonment.

3. COUNT 4: ATTEMPTED MURDER

You are sentenced to IO years imprisonment.

Effectively you are sentenced to 25 years imprisonment.

ACCUSED 2

You are sentenced to 35 years imprisonment. COUNT 3

You are sentenced to 15 years imprisonment. COUNT 4

You are sentenced to 15 years imprisonment.

Effectively you are sentenced to 35 years imprisonment.

ACCUSED 3

COUNT 1

4. The sentences on cow1ts 5 mid 6 in respettof accused I and 2 are confirmed.

5. It is ordered that the sentences on counts 3, 4, 5 and 6 in respect of accused I and 2 shall run concurrently with the sentence on count 1.

6. It is ordered that the sentences in respect of counts 3 and 4 in respect of accused 3 and 4 shall run concurrently with the sentence on count 1.

7. The sentences are antedated to 20 March 1997.

M

W MSIMEKI

JUDGE OF THE GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA

I agree

S

POTTERILL

N

TUCHTEN

HEARD ON:

FOR THE APPELLANTS: INSTRUCTED BY:

FOR THE RESPONDENT: INSTRUCTED BY:

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

S v Zinn 1969 (2) SA 537 (A)

Case cited

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.