Kgwele and Others v SK Enterprise and Others (21/38077) [2023] ZAGPJHC 719 (20 June 2023)
The court found that the oral lease agreements between the applicants and the first respondent were valid and enforceable, as there is no statutory requirement for leases to be in writing and the first respondent was properly mandated by the owner, with ratification of prior acts. The applicants failed to establish a legal or factual basis for compelling the respondents to render financial accounts or pay municipal rates and taxes, and relief against the owner was incompetent as he was not joined as a party. The application for an interdict against eviction was premature, as no eviction proceedings had commenced, and the requirements for a final interdict were not met. However, the...
- Citation
- [2023] ZAGPJHC 719
- Parties
- Applicant: Esther Kgwele; Applicant: William Themba Khumalo; Applicant: Memory Moyo; Applicant: Maluleke Sibanda; Applicant: Tumelani Ngwenya; Respondent: SK Enterprise; Respondent: Frank Ndlovu (Caretaker); Respondent: City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality; Respondent: Commissioner of Companies and Intellectual Property Commission; Respondent: Registrar of Deeds, Johannesburg
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 20 June 2023
- Case Number
- 21/38077
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Opposed Motion Court; Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted in part; restoration of water and electricity ordered; costs awarded to applicants.
- Judges
- M. Olivier
- Legal Topics
- Mandament Van Spolie, Lease Agreement Validity, Eviction Interdict, Municipal Services Disconnection, Fiduciary Duty to Account
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Esther Kgwele
Applicant
William Themba Khumalo
Applicant
Memory Moyo
Applicant
Maluleke Sibanda
Applicant
Tumelani Ngwenya
Applicant
SK Enterprise
Respondent
Frank Ndlovu (Caretaker)
Respondent
City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality
Respondent
Commissioner of Companies and Intellectual Property Commission
Respondent
Registrar of Deeds, Johannesburg
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Opposed Motion Court; Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the oral lease agreement between the applicants and first respondent is valid and enforceable.
- 2 Whether the first and second respondents had authority to conclude lease agreements and collect rentals.
- 3 Whether the applicants are entitled to an interdict restraining eviction and disconnection of municipal services.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the oral lease agreements between the applicants and the first respondent were valid and enforceable, as there is no statutory requirement for leases to be in writing and the first respondent was properly mandated by the owner, with ratification of prior acts. The applicants failed to establish a legal or factual basis for compelling the respondents to render financial accounts or pay municipal rates and taxes, and relief against the owner was incompetent as he was not joined as a party. The application for an interdict against eviction was premature, as no eviction proceedings had commenced, and the requirements for a final interdict were not met. However, the...
Court Disposition
Application granted in part; restoration of water and electricity ordered; costs awarded to applicants.
Orders
- The first and second respondents are ordered to restore access to water and electricity to each of the units occupied by the applicants, with immediate effect.
- The first and second respondents are to pay the costs of this application on a party and party scale.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment