Khabu and Others v Matlosana City Council and Another (56948/2014) [2021] ZAGPPHC 502 (4 August 2021)
The court found that the plaintiffs made a reasonable secret offer to settle, which the Municipality failed to consider or respond to, despite having evidence of its liability and negligence. The Municipality's inaction was unjustified, especially given its financial position and the hardship suffered by the plaintiffs. Public policy and justice demand that the Municipality bear the costs occasioned by its failure to accept a fair offer. The court exercised its discretion to award costs on an attorney and own client scale from the date of the offer and ordered the Municipality to pay the costs of Ndlovu Plant Hire CC as a successful defendant, as the joinder was necessitated by the...
- Citation
- [2021] ZAGPPHC 502
- Parties
- Applicant: Sinah Julia Khabu; Applicant: Otloleng Joseph Keikabile; Applicant: Mamello Khabu; Respondent: Matlosana City Council; Respondent: Ndlovu Plant Hire CC
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 4 August 2021
- Case Number
- 56948/2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Application for Reconsideration of Costs Order
- Outcome
- Application for reconsideration of costs granted. Previous cost orders replaced with orders for attorney and own client costs from the date of the secret offer and costs for Ndlovu Plant Hire CC.
- Judges
- N Janse van Nieuwenhuizen
- Legal Topics
- Costs Orders, Secret Offer to Settle, Vicarious Liability, Wrongful and Negligent Act, Party and Party Scale, Attorney and Own Client Scale
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sinah Julia Khabu
Applicant
Otloleng Joseph Keikabile
Applicant
Mamello Khabu
Applicant
Matlosana City Council
Respondent
Ndlovu Plant Hire CC
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Reconsideration of Costs Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the cost order granted on 21 February 2021 should be reconsidered in light of a secret offer to settle made by the plaintiffs.
- 2 Whether the Municipality should be liable for costs on an attorney and own client scale after the date of the secret offer.
- 3 Whether the Municipality should pay the costs of Ndlovu Plant Hire CC as a successful defendant.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiffs made a reasonable secret offer to settle, which the Municipality failed to consider or respond to, despite having evidence of its liability and negligence. The Municipality's inaction was unjustified, especially given its financial position and the hardship suffered by the plaintiffs. Public policy and justice demand that the Municipality bear the costs occasioned by its failure to accept a fair offer. The court exercised its discretion to award costs on an attorney and own client scale from the date of the offer and ordered the Municipality to pay the costs of Ndlovu Plant Hire CC as a successful defendant, as the joinder was necessitated by the...
Court Disposition
Application for reconsideration of costs granted. Previous cost orders replaced with orders for attorney and own client costs from the date of the secret offer and costs for Ndlovu Plant Hire CC.
Orders
- The plaintiffs' application for reconsideration of costs is granted.
- Paragraphs 2 and 3 of the order granted on 1 February 2021 relating to costs are replaced.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment