Kham and Others v Electoral Commission and Another (006/2013) [2015] ZAGPJHC 53 (19 March 2015)
The Electoral Court lacks the statutory power to grant the mandatory relief sought by the applicants, namely to order the Commission to appoint independent forensic investigators. The relevant legislation, including the Electoral Act and the Municipal Electoral Act, provides specific procedures for objections and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] ZAGPJHC 53
- Parties
- Applicant: Xolile David Kham; Applicant: Johannes Sesing Johnson; Applicant: Aaron Pasela Mhlophe; Applicant: Johanna Shonu Xaba; Applicant: Ntombi Beauty Dikupe; Applicant: Dikeledi Cathrine Molefe; Applicant: Velilele James Zicina; Applicant: Khotso Ratkoane; Respondent: Electoral Commission; Respondent: Member of the Executive Council, Department of Local Government and Traditional Affairs, North West Provincial Government
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 19 March 2015
- Case Number
- 006/2013
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Final Judgment After Hearing on Merits
- Outcome
- Application dismissed.
- Judges
- Moshidi, Shongwe, S Pather, M Mthembu, Wepener
- Legal Topics
- Electoral Irregularities, Voters Roll Objections, Free and Fair Elections, Judicial Review of Administrative Action, Materiality of Irregularities
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Xolile David Kham
Applicant
Johannes Sesing Johnson
Applicant
Aaron Pasela Mhlophe
Applicant
Johanna Shonu Xaba
Applicant
Ntombi Beauty Dikupe
Applicant
Dikeledi Cathrine Molefe
Applicant
Velilele James Zicina
Applicant
Khotso Ratkoane
Applicant
Electoral Commission
Respondent
Member of the Executive Council, Department of Local Government and Traditional Affairs, North West Provincial Government
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Final Judgment After Hearing on Merits
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Electoral Court has the power to order an independent forensic investigation into alleged irregularities in voter registration and voting.
- 2 Whether the alleged irregularities in the by-elections were material enough to affect the results and justify setting aside the elections.
- 3 Whether the applicants exhausted internal remedies and statutory procedures for objections to the voters' roll and election results.
Ratio Decidendi
The Electoral Court lacks the statutory power to grant the mandatory relief sought by the applicants, namely to order the Commission to appoint independent forensic investigators. The relevant legislation, including the Electoral Act and the Municipal Electoral Act, provides specific procedures for objections and appeals regarding election irregularities, which the applicants failed to exhaust. The Commission's own investigation found irregularities in voter registration, but these were not material to the outcome of the by-elections. The applicants did not discharge the onus of proving that the irregularities affected the results. The principle of legality and separation of powers...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed.
Orders
- The application is dismissed.
- There is no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment