Khoi San Revolution and Another v Smith and Others (2021/2017) [2019] ZANCHC 10 (13 March 2019)
The court found that the second applicant, Mr Peterson, was duly elected as president of the first applicant at the mini-conference in January 2016, as evidenced by the handwritten minutes and subsequent recognition by the IEC and party members. The respondents failed to provide credible evidence of his removal or any valid disciplinary proceedings. The argument that the constitution does not provide for an interim president was rejected, as the party was still in the process of establishment and interim leadership was necessary for registration. Although the second applicant did not provide a NEC resolution authorising the application on behalf of the first applicant, he was entitled to...
- Citation
- [2019] ZANCHC 10
- Parties
- Applicant: The Khoi San Revolution; Applicant: William Roderick Stanley Peterson; Respondent: Frank Smith; Respondent: Louisa Uithaler; Respondent: Juleen Denise Josephs; Respondent: Gert Bitterbos; Respondent: Marthinus Pieters; Respondent: The Nama Khoi Local Municipality; Respondent: The Municipal Manager: NamKhoi Local Municipality; Respondent: The Independent Electoral Commission
- Court
- Northern Cape High Court, Kimberley
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 13 March 2019
- Case Number
- 2021/2017
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted in favour of the second applicant, declaring him the legitimate and duly elected president of the first applicant. No order as to costs, and no costs to be recovered from the first applicant.
- Judges
- Williams
- Legal Topics
- Locus Standi, Internal Party Governance, Authority to Institute Proceedings, Electoral Commission Registration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Khoi San Revolution
Applicant
William Roderick Stanley Peterson
Applicant
Frank Smith
Respondent
Louisa Uithaler
Respondent
Juleen Denise Josephs
Respondent
Gert Bitterbos
Respondent
Marthinus Pieters
Respondent
The Nama Khoi Local Municipality
Respondent
The Municipal Manager: NamKhoi Local Municipality
Respondent
The Independent Electoral Commission
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the second applicant is the legitimate and duly elected president of the first applicant, the Khoi San Revolution.
- 2 Whether the second applicant has locus standi and authority to bring the application on behalf of the first applicant.
- 3 Whether there is a factual dispute regarding the election and termination of the second applicant's leadership that precludes determination on the papers.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the second applicant, Mr Peterson, was duly elected as president of the first applicant at the mini-conference in January 2016, as evidenced by the handwritten minutes and subsequent recognition by the IEC and party members. The respondents failed to provide credible evidence of his removal or any valid disciplinary proceedings. The argument that the constitution does not provide for an interim president was rejected, as the party was still in the process of establishment and interim leadership was necessary for registration. Although the second applicant did not provide a NEC resolution authorising the application on behalf of the first applicant, he was entitled to...
Court Disposition
Application granted in favour of the second applicant, declaring him the legitimate and duly elected president of the first applicant. No order as to costs, and no costs to be recovered from the first applicant.
Orders
- The second applicant, Mr William Roderick Stanley Peterson, is declared to be the legitimate and duly elected president of the first applicant.
- No order as to costs, save that no costs pertaining to this application are to be recovered from the first applicant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment