Khumalo v S (A262/16) [2016] ZAGPPHC 685 (11 August 2016)

Khumalo v S (A262/16) [2016] ZAGPPHC 685 (11 August 2016)

The court found that the appellant failed to present genuinely new facts in support of his bail application. The medical evidence and vehicle photographs were available or could have been obtained during the initial bail proceedings, and their presentation now did not constitute new facts. The appellant's deteriorating health, while relevant, was not sufficient on its own to establish exceptional circumstances, especially as alternative remedies exist. The alleged withholding of evidence by the State did not amount to a new fact, as the State is not obliged to disclose its case prior to trial. The court held that the appellant merely repackaged previously considered evidence, which does...

Citation
[2016] ZAGPPHC 685
Parties
Appellant: L T Khumalo; Respondent: The State
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
11 August 2016
Case Number
A262/16
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Refusal of Bail on New Facts
Outcome
Appeal dismissed.
Judges
M S Makamu
Legal Topics
Bail Application, Exceptional Circumstances, New Facts in Bail, Onus of Proof
Criminal Law Civil Procedure Bail Application Exceptional Circumstances New Facts in Bail Onus of Proof

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

L T Khumalo

Appellant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Refusal of Bail on New Facts

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant presented new facts sufficient to justify the granting of bail.
  2. 2 Whether the appellant's deteriorating medical condition constitutes an exceptional circumstance for bail.
  3. 3 Whether the State's alleged withholding of vehicle photographs amounts to a new fact relevant to bail.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the appellant failed to present genuinely new facts in support of his bail application. The medical evidence and vehicle photographs were available or could have been obtained during the initial bail proceedings, and their presentation now did not constitute new facts. The appellant's deteriorating health, while relevant, was not sufficient on its own to establish exceptional circumstances, especially as alternative remedies exist. The alleged withholding of evidence by the State did not amount to a new fact, as the State is not obliged to disclose its case prior to trial. The court held that the appellant merely repackaged previously considered evidence, which does...

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.