Kingston v Msimang and Others (13623/22) [2023] ZAGPPHC 1948 (27 November 2023)
The court found that the applicant, as co-owner, has the necessary locus standi to seek eviction of the first respondent and other occupiers. The first respondent, as executor, does not acquire ownership rights and is not entitled to occupy the property. The JVA governs the sale of the property after the death of one party, requiring sale by public auction since no agreement was reached for a private sale within the stipulated period. The enforcement of the JVA does not offend public policy or constitutional rights, as the family may retain the home by purchasing the applicant's share. No real factual disputes exist to preclude relief. The court determined that eviction is just and...
- Citation
- [2023] ZAGPPHC 1948
- Parties
- Applicant: Martin Lawrence Kingston; Respondent: Fabian Zimpande Msimang; Respondent: Unlawful Occupiers of Erf 3[...] D[...] Avenue, W[...] R[...], Pretoria; Respondent: Fabian Zimpande Msimang N.O. (executor of the Estate Late Meinrad Mendi Themba Boyi Msimang); Respondent: City of Tshwane Municipality; Respondent: Master of the High Court, Pretoria
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 27 November 2023
- Case Number
- 13623/22
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / First Instance Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted; eviction ordered; sale of property by public auction ordered; costs awarded against first respondent.
- Judges
- E van der Schyff
- Legal Topics
- Eviction, Co Ownership, Administration of Estates Act, Joint Venture Agreement, Public Auction, Locus Standi
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Martin Lawrence Kingston
Applicant
Fabian Zimpande Msimang
Respondent
Unlawful Occupiers of Erf 3[...] D[...] Avenue, W[...] R[...], Pretoria
Respondent
Fabian Zimpande Msimang N.O. (executor of the Estate Late Meinrad Mendi Themba Boyi Msimang)
Respondent
City of Tshwane Municipality
Respondent
Master of the High Court, Pretoria
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / First Instance Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant, as co-owner, has locus standi to seek eviction of the first respondent and other occupiers from the property.
- 2 Whether the occupation of the property by the first respondent is lawful.
- 3 Whether the Joint Venture Agreement (JVA) governs the sale and occupation of the property after the death of one party.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant, as co-owner, has the necessary locus standi to seek eviction of the first respondent and other occupiers. The first respondent, as executor, does not acquire ownership rights and is not entitled to occupy the property. The JVA governs the sale of the property after the death of one party, requiring sale by public auction since no agreement was reached for a private sale within the stipulated period. The enforcement of the JVA does not offend public policy or constitutional rights, as the family may retain the home by purchasing the applicant's share. No real factual disputes exist to preclude relief. The court determined that eviction is just and...
Court Disposition
Application granted; eviction ordered; sale of property by public auction ordered; costs awarded against first respondent.
Orders
- The first and second respondents are evicted from the property, subject to the condition below.
- The first and second respondents must vacate the property by 29 February 2024, unless an alternative written arrangement is made.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment