Download PDF

South Africa Judgment

Competition Tribunal

Kkr Dvb Aviation Capital Limited v AerCap Holdings N.V.; In re: A Portfolio of 37 Aircraft (LM051JUN16) [2016] ZACT 66 (17 August 2016)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Tribunal found that there is no overlap between the activities of the merging parties in South Africa, as the acquiring group is not active in the ownership or leasing of aircraft in the country. The transaction only involves the transfer of ownership of one aircraft located in South Africa, which is leased to Comair South Africa Limited. The Competition Commission concluded that the transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any market in South Africa, and the Tribunal concurred. Furthermore, the merging parties confirmed that the transaction will have no negative effect on employment and raises no other public interest concerns. Accordingly, the Tribunal approved the proposed transaction unconditionally.

Court disposition

The proposed transaction is approved unconditionally.

Orders

  • The merger between KKR DVB Aviation Capital Limited and AerCap Holdings N.V. in respect of a portfolio of 37 aircraft is approved unconditionally.

02

Material facts

Parties

KKR DVB Aviation Capital Limited

Applicant Counsel: Shawn van der Meulen

AerCap Holdings N.V.

Respondent

Amounts and remedies

  • Number of Aircraft in Portfolio: 37
  • Number of Aircraft Located in South Africa: 1

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Merger Control / Approval

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant submits that the proposed transaction presents an attractive investment opportunity to expand its current portfolio of commercial aircraft. The transaction involves the acquisition of a portfolio of 37 aircraft, only one of which is located in South Africa. The applicant is not currently active in the ownership or leasing of aircraft in South Africa.
Respondent
The respondent submits that the proposed transaction will enable the Transferred Firm to realise certain aircraft in its portfolio at optimal values, resulting in financial benefits to its shareholders. The transaction will not negatively affect employment and raises no other public interest concerns.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998

    A merger may only be prohibited if it is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market.

  2. 02

    Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998

    Public interest considerations, including employment effects, must be assessed in merger proceedings.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Tribunal found that there is no overlap between the activities of the merging parties in South Africa, as the acquiring group is not active in the ownership or leasing of aircraft in the country. The transaction only involves the transfer of ownership of one aircraft located in South Africa, which is leased to Comair South Africa Limited. The Competition Commission concluded that the transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any market in South Africa, and the Tribunal concurred. Furthermore, the merging parties confirmed that the transaction will have no negative effect on employment and raises no other public interest concerns. Accordingly, the Tribunal approved the proposed transaction unconditionally.

Obiter and limits

  • The Tribunal notes that all aircraft in the portfolio are passenger aircraft used for civilian purposes and leased to third parties.
  • The Tribunal concurs with the Commission's conclusion that the transaction does not raise competition concerns in South Africa.

Court disposition

The proposed transaction is approved unconditionally.

  • The merger between KKR DVB Aviation Capital Limited and AerCap Holdings N.V. in respect of a portfolio of 37 aircraft is approved unconditionally.

Source and reliance status

Competition Tribunal

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Competition Tribunal

Judgment

[2016] ZACT 66

COMPETITION

TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

Case No: LM051Jun16

In the matter between:

KKR

DVB AVIATION CAPITAL

LIMITED

Primary Acquiring Firm

and

AerCap

HOLDINGS N.V. IN RESPECT OF Primary

Target Firm

A PORTFOLIO OF 37 AIRCRAFT

Panel

: Norman Manoim (Presiding Member)

: Medi Mokuena (Tribunal Member)

: Andiswa Ndoni (Tribunal Member)

Heard on

: 20 July 2016

Order Issued on

: 20 July 2016

Reasons Issued on : 17 August 2016

Reasons for Decision

Approval

[1] On 20 July 2016, the Competition Tribunal ("Tribunal") approved the proposed transaction between KKR DVB Aviation Capital Limited and AerCap Holdings N.V. in respect of a portfolio of 37 aircraft.

[2] The reasons for approving the proposed transaction follow.

Parties to proposed transaction

Primary acquiring firm

[3] The primary acquiring firm is KKR DVB Aviation Capital Limited ("KKR DVB"), a special purpose vehicle created for the purpose of the proposed transaction.

[4] KKR DVB is controlled by KDAC Aircraft Finance Limited ("KDAC"), a special purpose vehicle created for the purpose of the proposed transaction.

[5]

KKR DVB and

KDAC are ultimately controlled by KKR, a limited partnership incorporated in accordance with the laws of the state of Delaware, United States of America.[1]

[6] KKR is a global investment firms that offer a broad range of alternative asset funds and other investment products to investors and provide capital market solutions for the firm, its portfolio companies and other clients. Through its various subsidiaries, KKR manages investments across multiple asset classes including private equity, real estate, energy, infrastructure, manufacturing, IT, healthcare, credit strategies, hedge funds and capital markets.

Primary target firm

[7] The primary target firm is AerCap Holdings N.V. ("AerCap") in respect of a portfolio of 37 aircraft. AerCap is a company incorporated under the law of the Netherlands. The portfolio of 37 aircraft will collectively be referred to as the "Transferred Firm".[2]

[8] The Transferred Firm is ultimately controlled by AerCap, a public company listed on the New York Stock Exchange and as such is not controlled by any firm.

[9] The Target Firm comprise of a portfolio of 37 aircrafts, of which only one (1)is located in South Africa.

Proposed transaction and rationale

[10] The Acquiring Group intends to acquire the Transferred Firm from AerCap through its subsidiary KKR DVB. On completion of the

transaction, the Acquiring Group will control the Transferred Firm through KKR DVB.

[11] The Acquiring Group submits that the proposed transaction presents an attractive investment opportunity to expand its current portfolio of commercial aircraft.

[12] AerCap submits that the proposed transaction will enable the Transferred Firm to realise that certain of the aircrafts in its portfolio of aircraft at optimal values, which in turn results in financial benefits to its shareholders.

[13] As noted, with regards to South Africa, the transaction only involves the transfer of ownership of one aircraft, which is presently leased to Comair South Africa Limited ("Comair'').

Impact on competition

[14] The Competition Commission ("Commission") considered the activities of the merging parties and found that no overlap exists between the parties in respect of South Africa. This is because the Acquiring Group is not active in the ownership or leasing of aircraft in South Africa..

[15] Given the above the Commission concluded that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any market in South Africa.

[16] We concur with the Commission's conclusion.

Public interest

[17] The merging parties confirmed that the proposed transaction will have no negative effect on employment.

[18] The proposed transaction further raises no other public interest concerns. Conclusion

[19] In light of the above, we conclude that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. In addition, no public interest issues arise from the proposed transaction. Accordingly, we approve the proposed transaction unconditionally.

17 August 2016

DATE

_________

Mr. Norman Manoim

Ms Medi Mokuena and Ms Andiswa Ndoni concurring

Tribunal Researcher: Busisiwe Masina

For the merging parties: Shawn van der Meulen of Webber Wentzel

For the Commission: Billy Mabatamela and Xolela Nokele

[1] KKR is ultimately controlled by K.KR Management LLC, a general partner of KKR.

[2] The Transferred Firm is active in aircraft leasing and aviation finance with a fleet of over 1.200 owned and managed aircraft. All aircraft are passenger aircraft used for civilian purposes and leased to third parties.

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.