Kobus Crouse Trust v Department of Water Affairs and Forestry (WT 28/02/2006) [2008] ZAWT 2 (28 November 2008)

Kobus Crouse Trust v Department of Water Affairs and Forestry (WT 28/02/2006) [2008] ZAWT 2 (28 November 2008)

The Tribunal found that the appellant failed to provide any evidence or documentation establishing authorisation for the water use in question. The respondent's investigation revealed the existence of two illegal dams impeding water flow and depriving downstream property owners of water. The appellant did not dispute these findings despite multiple opportunities. The Tribunal concluded that the directive was factually and legally justified, and the appellant did not discharge the onus to prove lawful water use. Accordingly, the appeal was dismissed and the directive upheld.

Citation
[2008] ZAWT 2
Parties
Appellant: Kobus Crouse Trust; Respondent: Department of Water Affairs and Forestry
Court
Water Tribunal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
28 November 2008
Case Number
WT 28/02/2006
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Hearing
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; directive upheld.
Judges
L.J Lekale, W Singo, Hubert Thompson, A.S Hadebe
Legal Topics
National Water Act, Water Use Authorisation, Administrative Directive, Appeal Procedure
Administrative Law Environmental Law National Water Act Water Use Authorisation Administrative Directive Appeal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kobus Crouse Trust

Appellant

Department of Water Affairs and Forestry

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether there was a factual and/or legal basis for the directive issued by the respondent under section 53(1) of the National Water Act.
  2. 2 Whether the appellant had the requisite authorisation for the water use in question.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the appellant failed to provide any evidence or documentation establishing authorisation for the water use in question. The respondent's investigation revealed the existence of two illegal dams impeding water flow and depriving downstream property owners of water. The appellant did not dispute these findings despite multiple opportunities. The Tribunal concluded that the directive was factually and legally justified, and the appellant did not discharge the onus to prove lawful water use. Accordingly, the appeal was dismissed and the directive upheld.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; directive upheld.

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.
  • The directive issued by the respondent is upheld.