Kodisang and Others v THK Gallery and Others (2025/066625) [2025] ZAWCHC 214 (21 May 2025)
The applicants established a clear right to the intellectual property embodied in the exhibition 'YOUR BEAUTY IS MY CONCERN' through prior public acclaim, commercial success, and association with the concept. The respondents' exhibition, 'YOUR BEAUTY IS OUR CONCERN', is substantially similar in title and theme, creating a likelihood of confusion and amounting to misappropriation and passing off. The applicants demonstrated ongoing harm to their goodwill and creative legacy, which cannot be remedied by damages. The urgency was justified by the ongoing nature of the exhibition and attempts to resolve the dispute. The joinder of THK Gallery was proper as the cause of action arose at its...
- Citation
- [2025] ZAWCHC 214
- Parties
- Applicant: Kelebogile Tsholofolo Sylia Kodisang; Applicant: Dahlia Maubane; Applicant: Fhulufelo Mobadi; Applicant: Bongiwe Phakhati; Applicant: Fiona Davhana; Applicant: Simphiwe Julia Thabede; Respondent: THK Gallery; Respondent: Trevor Stuurman; Respondent: Trevor Stuurman Foundation
- Court
- Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 21 May 2025
- Case Number
- 2025/066625
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Part A: Application for Interim Interdict Pending Final Relief
- Outcome
- Interim interdict granted in favour of the applicants pending final determination of Part B.
- Judges
- Da Silva Salie
- Legal Topics
- Passing Off, Interim Interdict, Artistic Goodwill, Plagiarism, Misappropriation of Creative Work
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kelebogile Tsholofolo Sylia Kodisang
Applicant
Dahlia Maubane
Applicant
Fhulufelo Mobadi
Applicant
Bongiwe Phakhati
Applicant
Fiona Davhana
Applicant
Simphiwe Julia Thabede
Applicant
THK Gallery
Respondent
Trevor Stuurman
Respondent
Trevor Stuurman Foundation
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Part A: Application for Interim Interdict Pending Final Relief
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants have established a clear right to the intellectual property in question.
- 2 Whether the respondents' exhibition constitutes passing off and misappropriation of the applicants' creative concept.
- 3 Whether the requirements for an interim interdict are satisfied, including urgency and absence of alternative remedy.
Ratio Decidendi
The applicants established a clear right to the intellectual property embodied in the exhibition 'YOUR BEAUTY IS MY CONCERN' through prior public acclaim, commercial success, and association with the concept. The respondents' exhibition, 'YOUR BEAUTY IS OUR CONCERN', is substantially similar in title and theme, creating a likelihood of confusion and amounting to misappropriation and passing off. The applicants demonstrated ongoing harm to their goodwill and creative legacy, which cannot be remedied by damages. The urgency was justified by the ongoing nature of the exhibition and attempts to resolve the dispute. The joinder of THK Gallery was proper as the cause of action arose at its...
Court Disposition
Interim interdict granted in favour of the applicants pending final determination of Part B.
Orders
- The respondents are interdicted and restrained from disseminating, exhibiting and proceeding with the presentation of the exhibition titled 'Your Beauty is My Concern' including 'Your Beauty is Our Concern', pending the final determination of the relief sought in Part B of this application, including removal of any...
- The respondents are interdicted and restrained from selling, transferring or otherwise disposing of any artworks associated with the exhibition under the theme 'Your Beauty is My Concern' including 'Your Beauty is Our Concern' pending the final determination of the relief sought in Part B of this application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment