Koetsioe and Others v Minister of Defence and Military Veterans and Others (12096/2021) [2021] ZAGPPHC 203 (6 April 2021)
The court found that the demolition of housing structures by the military without a court order amounted to unlawful eviction and a breach of section 26(3) of the Constitution. The military's actions constituted self-help and spoliation, regardless of any breach of agreement by the villagers. Assaults and harassment by soldiers were found to be unlawful, though the extent and damages are to be determined in Part B of the application. The discharge of firearms and military ordnance in the vicinity of the settlement is prohibited under existing interim court orders, which remain in force. The applicants' refusal to consider mediation under Rule 41A was criticised, and the court held that...
- Citation
- [2021] ZAGPPHC 203
- Parties
- Applicant: Chris Koetsioe; Applicant: Fernando Mukuqua; Applicant: Themba Maphanga; Applicant: Piet Chabalala; Applicant: Gracinda Mazive; Applicant: Bonisile Mangisa; Applicant: Bulelani Magaba; Applicant: Mduduzi Mokomo; Respondent: Minister of Defence and Military Veterans; Respondent: South African National Defence Force; Respondent: Officer Commanding Marievale Engineering Regiment; Respondent: Nosiviwe Noluthando Mapisa-Nqakula; Respondent: Major Meissner; Respondent: Colonel Mafihlwase Reah Mkhize
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 6 April 2021
- Case Number
- 12096/2021
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Part A: Urgent Relief; Part B: Damages Postponed Sine Die
- Outcome
- Urgent relief granted in part; demolition of houses without court order declared unlawful; interdicts issued; compensation and damages postponed to Part B; costs for Part A not awarded.
- Judges
- N Davis
- Legal Topics
- Eviction Without Court Order, Section 26 Rights, Spoliation, State Brutality, Urgent Interdict, Mediation Rule 41a
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chris Koetsioe
Applicant
Fernando Mukuqua
Applicant
Themba Maphanga
Applicant
Piet Chabalala
Applicant
Gracinda Mazive
Applicant
Bonisile Mangisa
Applicant
Bulelani Magaba
Applicant
Mduduzi Mokomo
Applicant
Minister of Defence and Military Veterans
Respondent
South African National Defence Force
Respondent
Officer Commanding Marievale Engineering Regiment
Respondent
Nosiviwe Noluthando Mapisa-Nqakula
Respondent
Major Meissner
Respondent
Colonel Mafihlwase Reah Mkhize
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Part A: Urgent Relief; Part B: Damages Postponed Sine Die
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the demolition of housing structures by the military without a court order constitutes unlawful eviction and breach of section 26(3) of the Constitution.
- 2 Whether assaults and harassment by soldiers against residents amount to actionable delicts.
- 3 Whether the discharge of firearms and military ordnance in the vicinity of the settlement is unlawful under existing court orders.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the demolition of housing structures by the military without a court order amounted to unlawful eviction and a breach of section 26(3) of the Constitution. The military's actions constituted self-help and spoliation, regardless of any breach of agreement by the villagers. Assaults and harassment by soldiers were found to be unlawful, though the extent and damages are to be determined in Part B of the application. The discharge of firearms and military ordnance in the vicinity of the settlement is prohibited under existing interim court orders, which remain in force. The applicants' refusal to consider mediation under Rule 41A was criticised, and the court held that...
Court Disposition
Urgent relief granted in part; demolition of houses without court order declared unlawful; interdicts issued; compensation and damages postponed to Part B; costs for Part A not awarded.
Orders
- No housing structures in the settlement adjacent to Marievale Military Base may be demolished without a court order.
- Respondents must ensure members of the South African National Defence Force adhere to existing court orders and pending rule nisi until finalisation.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment