Kolisa and Others v City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality and Another (J1814/19) [2019] ZALCJHB 227 (12 September 2019)
The court found that SAMWU, IMATU, and the affected employees were necessary parties to the application as they were signatories to the settlement agreement and had a direct and substantial interest in its operation. The applicants' piecemeal approach was inappropriate and contrary to the principles of expeditious dispute resolution in labour matters. The setting aside of clause 1 would affect the entire settlement agreement, making joinder essential. The applicants failed to join the necessary parties despite warnings, and fairness dictated that costs be awarded against them.
- Citation
- [2019] ZALCJHB 227
- Parties
- Applicant: Mthobeli Solam Kolisa; Applicant: 44 Other Employees of the City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality; Respondent: City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality; Respondent: Municipal Manager of the City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 12 September 2019
- Case Number
- J1814/19
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Application for Interim Relief and Joinder Objection
- Outcome
- Application postponed sine die due to non-joinder; costs awarded against applicants.
- Judges
- Prinsloo
- Legal Topics
- Non Joinder, Urgent Interdict, Settlement Agreement, Remuneration Dispute, Costs Award
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mthobeli Solam Kolisa
Applicant
44 Other Employees of the City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality
Applicant
City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality
Respondent
Municipal Manager of the City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application for Interim Relief and Joinder Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application should be dismissed for non-joinder of necessary parties.
- 2 Whether the applicants are entitled to set aside clause 1 of the settlement agreement pending review proceedings.
- 3 Whether the applicants are entitled to a retrospective salary increase of 18%.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that SAMWU, IMATU, and the affected employees were necessary parties to the application as they were signatories to the settlement agreement and had a direct and substantial interest in its operation. The applicants' piecemeal approach was inappropriate and contrary to the principles of expeditious dispute resolution in labour matters. The setting aside of clause 1 would affect the entire settlement agreement, making joinder essential. The applicants failed to join the necessary parties despite warnings, and fairness dictated that costs be awarded against them.
Court Disposition
Application postponed sine die due to non-joinder; costs awarded against applicants.
Orders
- The point in limine on non-joinder is upheld.
- The matter is postponed sine die.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment