Komane and Another v Premier: Limpopo Province and Others (6711/2018) [2020] ZALMPPHC 75 (8 September 2020)
The Court found that neither the First nor the Second Applicant had locus standi to bring the application. The First Applicant was not recognised as a Senior Traditional Leader under the Limpopo Traditional Leadership and Institutions Act, 2005, and did not hold a Certificate of Appointment. The Second Applicant was not a recognised traditional council under the Act. The resolution presented by the Applicants did not confer authority to litigate. Without locus standi, the Applicants could not demonstrate a clear right, which is a prerequisite for a final interdict. The Court granted condonation for the late filing of the Respondents' answering affidavit, finding the explanation reasonable...
- Citation
- [2020] ZALMPPHC 75
- Parties
- Applicant: Kgoshi Mohube Philemon Komane; Applicant: Bakone Ba Maanakane Tribal Council; Respondent: Premier: Limpopo Province; Respondent: Geronah Resources (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Nkwe Platinum South Africa (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Kgagudi Kenneth Sekhukhune; Respondent: Sekhukhune Tribal Council; Respondent: Kgatledi Letty Komane
- Court
- Limpopo High Court, Polokwane
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 8 September 2020
- Case Number
- 6711/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Final Determination of Application for Interdict and Review
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- E M Makgoba
- Legal Topics
- Locus Standi, Final Interdict, Traditional Leadership, Condonation of Late Filing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kgoshi Mohube Philemon Komane
Applicant
Bakone Ba Maanakane Tribal Council
Applicant
Premier: Limpopo Province
Respondent
Geronah Resources (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Nkwe Platinum South Africa (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Kgagudi Kenneth Sekhukhune
Respondent
Sekhukhune Tribal Council
Respondent
Kgatledi Letty Komane
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Final Determination of Application for Interdict and Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the First and Second Applicants have locus standi to bring the application.
- 2 Whether the Applicants have satisfied the requirements for a final interdict against the Respondents.
- 3 Whether condonation should be granted for the late filing of affidavits.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that neither the First nor the Second Applicant had locus standi to bring the application. The First Applicant was not recognised as a Senior Traditional Leader under the Limpopo Traditional Leadership and Institutions Act, 2005, and did not hold a Certificate of Appointment. The Second Applicant was not a recognised traditional council under the Act. The resolution presented by the Applicants did not confer authority to litigate. Without locus standi, the Applicants could not demonstrate a clear right, which is a prerequisite for a final interdict. The Court granted condonation for the late filing of the Respondents' answering affidavit, finding the explanation reasonable...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The application is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment