Kona v Premier Eastern Cape and Others (3277/2018) [2023] ZAECMKHC 75 (20 June 2023)
The court found that the applicant's delay in instituting judicial review proceedings was excessive and unreasonable, far exceeding the 180-day period prescribed by PAJA. The process pursued by the applicant through the Provincial House did not constitute a valid internal remedy for the Premier's recognition decision, and thus did not suspend the running of the time period. The explanation for the delay was incomplete and inadequate, with the applicant failing to take reasonable steps to expedite the matter or seek legal advice promptly. The prospects of success were limited, as the recognition process followed the requirements of the applicable legislation and the applicant's exclusion...
- Citation
- [2023] ZAECMKHC 75
- Parties
- Applicant: Zukiswa Kona; Respondent: The Premier, Eastern Cape; Respondent: MEC for Co-operative Governance and Traditional Affairs (Eastern Cape); Respondent: Provincial House of Traditional Leaders (Eastern Cape); Respondent: Mbukumbuku Kona; Respondent: Nomisile Kona; Respondent: Kona Royal Family; Respondent: Ntsikelelo Kwebese
- Court
- Eastern Cape High Court, Makhanda
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 20 June 2023
- Case Number
- 3277/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Application for Extension of Time and Judicial Review
- Outcome
- Application dismissed.
- Judges
- Govindjee
- Legal Topics
- Promotion of Administrative Justice Act, Judicial Review Delay, Traditional Leadership Succession, Unfair Discrimination, Internal Remedies, Condonation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Zukiswa Kona
Applicant
The Premier, Eastern Cape
Respondent
MEC for Co-operative Governance and Traditional Affairs (Eastern Cape)
Respondent
Provincial House of Traditional Leaders (Eastern Cape)
Respondent
Mbukumbuku Kona
Respondent
Nomisile Kona
Respondent
Kona Royal Family
Respondent
Ntsikelelo Kwebese
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Application for Extension of Time and Judicial Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant's delay in instituting judicial review proceedings should be condoned.
- 2 Whether internal remedies were available and exhausted before approaching the court.
- 3 Whether the recognition of the fourth respondent as headman was lawful and in accordance with customary law.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant's delay in instituting judicial review proceedings was excessive and unreasonable, far exceeding the 180-day period prescribed by PAJA. The process pursued by the applicant through the Provincial House did not constitute a valid internal remedy for the Premier's recognition decision, and thus did not suspend the running of the time period. The explanation for the delay was incomplete and inadequate, with the applicant failing to take reasonable steps to expedite the matter or seek legal advice promptly. The prospects of success were limited, as the recognition process followed the requirements of the applicable legislation and the applicant's exclusion...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed.
Orders
- The application is dismissed.
- Each party is to pay its own costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment