Kopeledi (Pty) Ltd v Madontsela and Others (JR 429/07) [2008] ZALC 83; (2009) 30 ILJ 158 (LC) (27 June 2008)
The court found that the Commissioner committed a gross irregularity by misconstruing the requirements of section 197 of the Labour Relations Act and by failing to properly consider the suspensive condition in the sale agreement. There was no evidence that the suspensive condition (first payment) had been fulfilled, meaning the transfer of the business was not unconditional and final. The evidence indicated that the putative transferee employer, Nhlapo, dismissed the employees, not the applicant. The Commissioner failed to join Nhlapo as a necessary party, despite his direct and substantial interest in the dispute. The findings that the applicant was required to consult with the...
- Citation
- [2008] ZALC 83
- Parties
- Applicant: Kopeledi (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Elias Madontsela and 20 Others; Respondent: The Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration; Respondent: The Commissioner, Norman Mbelengwa
- Court
- Labour Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 27 June 2008
- Case Number
- JR 429/07
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment on Review of Arbitration Award
- Outcome
- The arbitration award made by the third respondent is set aside. The matter is remitted to the second respondent for rehearing before a different Commissioner. No order as to costs is made.
- Judges
- C.J. Musi
- Legal Topics
- Transfer of Business as Going Concern, Section 197 Lra, Dismissal, Joinder of Parties, Arbitration Review
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kopeledi (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Elias Madontsela and 20 Others
Respondent
The Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration
Respondent
The Commissioner, Norman Mbelengwa
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment on Review of Arbitration Award
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sale of the plastering division constituted a transfer of business as a going concern under section 197 of the Labour Relations Act.
- 2 Whether the applicant remained the employer of the first respondents after the purported transfer.
- 3 Whether the first respondents were dismissed by the applicant or the transferee employer.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Commissioner committed a gross irregularity by misconstruing the requirements of section 197 of the Labour Relations Act and by failing to properly consider the suspensive condition in the sale agreement. There was no evidence that the suspensive condition (first payment) had been fulfilled, meaning the transfer of the business was not unconditional and final. The evidence indicated that the putative transferee employer, Nhlapo, dismissed the employees, not the applicant. The Commissioner failed to join Nhlapo as a necessary party, despite his direct and substantial interest in the dispute. The findings that the applicant was required to consult with the...
Court Disposition
The arbitration award made by the third respondent is set aside. The matter is remitted to the second respondent for rehearing before a different Commissioner. No order as to costs is made.
Orders
- The arbitration award made by the third respondent dated 22 January 2007 is set aside.
- This matter is remitted to the second respondent for rehearing before a Commissioner other than the third respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment