Kriel NO v Road Accident Fund (04/30915) [2008] ZAGPHC 483 (29 February 2008)
The court determined that a 10% general contingency deduction is appropriate for Fourie's future loss of earnings, considering his stable employment history, the relatively short period to retirement, and the absence of evidence establishing a residual earning capacity or increased risk of unemployment. The court declined to order the establishment of a trust or appointment of a curator bonis for the protection of the award, as no proper enquiry into Fourie's mental condition was held and the evidence did not absolutely satisfy the requirements for such interference. The court made orders for payment of the agreed damages, provision of an undertaking for future medical expenses, and...
- Citation
- [2008] ZAGPHC 483
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Adv Herman Kriel NO (Curator ad litem of Johannes Jacobus Petrus Fourie); Defendant: Road Accident Fund
- Court
- High Courts - Gauteng
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 29 February 2008
- Case Number
- 04/30915
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Trial / Quantum Determination After Liability Resolved
- Outcome
- The court ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff, as curator ad litem for Fourie, the sum of R2,922,519.13 within 14 days, with interest accruing thereafter. The defendant must also provide an undertaking for future medical expenses limited to 80%, and pay party and party costs including costs of two counsel and...
- Judges
- P A Meyer
- Legal Topics
- Road Accident Fund Act, General Contingency Deduction, Loss of Earnings, Curator Ad Litem, Future Medical Expenses
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Adv Herman Kriel NO (Curator ad litem of Johannes Jacobus Petrus Fourie)
Plaintiff
Road Accident Fund
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Quantum Determination After Liability Resolved
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate general contingency deduction to be applied to Fourie's future loss of earnings?
- 2 Should the proceeds of the award be protected by a trust or by appointment of a curator bonis?
- 3 What is the proper form of the order regarding payment and protection of the award?
Ratio Decidendi
The court determined that a 10% general contingency deduction is appropriate for Fourie's future loss of earnings, considering his stable employment history, the relatively short period to retirement, and the absence of evidence establishing a residual earning capacity or increased risk of unemployment. The court declined to order the establishment of a trust or appointment of a curator bonis for the protection of the award, as no proper enquiry into Fourie's mental condition was held and the evidence did not absolutely satisfy the requirements for such interference. The court made orders for payment of the agreed damages, provision of an undertaking for future medical expenses, and...
Court Disposition
The court ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff, as curator ad litem for Fourie, the sum of R2,922,519.13 within 14 days, with interest accruing thereafter. The defendant must also provide an undertaking for future medical expenses limited to 80%, and pay party and party costs including costs of two counsel and...
Orders
- The defendant is ordered to pay R2,922,519.13 to the plaintiff in his capacity as curator ad litem for Fourie within 14 days, failing which interest at 15.5% per annum will accrue until final payment.
- The award shall be paid into the trust account of Hauptfleisch Incorporated, attorneys for Fourie.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment