Krohn v Road Accident Fund (1402/2013) [2015] ZAGPPHC 697 (6 October 2015)

Krohn v Road Accident Fund (1402/2013) [2015] ZAGPPHC 697 (6 October 2015)

The court found that the plaintiff suffered severe and permanent injuries resulting in significant neurocognitive and physical impairments, which substantially diminish his earning capacity and render stable employment until retirement highly unlikely. The expert and actuarial evidence, uncontested by the defendant, justified a 15% pre-morbid and 50% post-morbid contingency deduction, resulting in a future loss of earnings of R3,213,914.00. The defendant's offer was unsupported by evidence or reasoning and was rejected. The court awarded general damages, past medical expenses, and past loss of earnings as agreed, and ordered the defendant to furnish an undertaking for future medical...

Citation
[2015] ZAGPPHC 697
Parties
Plaintiff: Ruan Krohn; Defendant: Road Accident Fund
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
6 October 2015
Case Number
1402/2013
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Final Judgment
Outcome
Plaintiff's claim for damages is upheld; quantum determined as per uncontested expert evidence.
Judges
TS Madima
Legal Topics
Road Accident Fund Act, Personal Injury, Future Loss of Earnings, Contingency Deductions, General Damages

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ruan Krohn

Plaintiff

Road Accident Fund

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Trial / Final Judgment

  1. 1 What is the appropriate quantum for future loss of earnings given the plaintiff's injuries and prognosis.
  2. 2 What contingency deductions should be applied to the calculation of future loss of earnings.
  3. 3 Is the defendant liable for general damages, past medical expenses, and past loss of earnings.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff suffered severe and permanent injuries resulting in significant neurocognitive and physical impairments, which substantially diminish his earning capacity and render stable employment until retirement highly unlikely. The expert and actuarial evidence, uncontested by the defendant, justified a 15% pre-morbid and 50% post-morbid contingency deduction, resulting in a future loss of earnings of R3,213,914.00. The defendant's offer was unsupported by evidence or reasoning and was rejected. The court awarded general damages, past medical expenses, and past loss of earnings as agreed, and ordered the defendant to furnish an undertaking for future medical...

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's claim for damages is upheld; quantum determined as per uncontested expert evidence.

Orders

  • The defendant is to pay R990,674.06 representing general damages, past medical expenses, and past loss of earnings.
  • The defendant is to pay R3,213,914.00 for future loss of earnings.