Krohn v Road Accident Fund (1402/2013) [2015] ZAGPPHC 697 (6 October 2015)
The court found that the plaintiff suffered severe and permanent injuries resulting in significant neurocognitive and physical impairments, which substantially diminish his earning capacity and render stable employment until retirement highly unlikely. The expert and actuarial evidence, uncontested by the defendant, justified a 15% pre-morbid and 50% post-morbid contingency deduction, resulting in a future loss of earnings of R3,213,914.00. The defendant's offer was unsupported by evidence or reasoning and was rejected. The court awarded general damages, past medical expenses, and past loss of earnings as agreed, and ordered the defendant to furnish an undertaking for future medical...
- Citation
- [2015] ZAGPPHC 697
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Ruan Krohn; Defendant: Road Accident Fund
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 6 October 2015
- Case Number
- 1402/2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Trial / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claim for damages is upheld; quantum determined as per uncontested expert evidence.
- Judges
- TS Madima
- Legal Topics
- Road Accident Fund Act, Personal Injury, Future Loss of Earnings, Contingency Deductions, General Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ruan Krohn
Plaintiff
Road Accident Fund
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate quantum for future loss of earnings given the plaintiff's injuries and prognosis.
- 2 What contingency deductions should be applied to the calculation of future loss of earnings.
- 3 Is the defendant liable for general damages, past medical expenses, and past loss of earnings.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff suffered severe and permanent injuries resulting in significant neurocognitive and physical impairments, which substantially diminish his earning capacity and render stable employment until retirement highly unlikely. The expert and actuarial evidence, uncontested by the defendant, justified a 15% pre-morbid and 50% post-morbid contingency deduction, resulting in a future loss of earnings of R3,213,914.00. The defendant's offer was unsupported by evidence or reasoning and was rejected. The court awarded general damages, past medical expenses, and past loss of earnings as agreed, and ordered the defendant to furnish an undertaking for future medical...
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claim for damages is upheld; quantum determined as per uncontested expert evidence.
Orders
- The defendant is to pay R990,674.06 representing general damages, past medical expenses, and past loss of earnings.
- The defendant is to pay R3,213,914.00 for future loss of earnings.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment