K.S v S.S (4948/2009) [2012] ZAKZDHC 92 (21 December 2012)

K.S v S.S (4948/2009) [2012] ZAKZDHC 92 (21 December 2012)

The court found that the marriage between the parties had irretrievably broken down, with no reasonable prospect of restoration, as evidenced by their prolonged separation and the circumstances described. The plaintiff was employed, self-supporting, and would receive half the defendant's pension interest and a share of the proceeds from the sale of the matrimonial property. The court applied the 'clean break' principle and held that permanent maintenance was not justified, given the plaintiff's earning capacity and resources. The defendant was ordered to retain the plaintiff as a dependant on his medical aid and pay premiums, but the plaintiff was responsible for any medical surcharges...

Citation
[2012] ZAKZDHC 92
Parties
Plaintiff: K S; Defendant: S S
Court
Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Durban
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
21 December 2012
Case Number
4948/2009
Procedural Posture
Divorce Action / Final Judgment
Outcome
The marriage between the parties is dissolved. No maintenance is awarded to the plaintiff. The plaintiff is retained as a dependant on the defendant's medical aid, with the defendant paying premiums but the plaintiff responsible for surcharges and excesses. The matrimonial property is to be sold and proceeds divided...
Judges
Henriques
Legal Topics
Divorce, Maintenance, Division of Pension Interest, Division of Property, Costs, Medical Aid Dependant
Family and Children Divorce Maintenance Division of Pension Interest Division of Property Costs Medical Aid Dependant

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

K S

Plaintiff

S S

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Divorce Action / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the marriage between the parties has irretrievably broken down.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to maintenance for life or until remarriage.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff should be retained as a dependant on the defendant's medical aid and the defendant pay excesses.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the marriage between the parties had irretrievably broken down, with no reasonable prospect of restoration, as evidenced by their prolonged separation and the circumstances described. The plaintiff was employed, self-supporting, and would receive half the defendant's pension interest and a share of the proceeds from the sale of the matrimonial property. The court applied the 'clean break' principle and held that permanent maintenance was not justified, given the plaintiff's earning capacity and resources. The defendant was ordered to retain the plaintiff as a dependant on his medical aid and pay premiums, but the plaintiff was responsible for any medical surcharges...

Court Disposition

The marriage between the parties is dissolved. No maintenance is awarded to the plaintiff. The plaintiff is retained as a dependant on the defendant's medical aid, with the defendant paying premiums but the plaintiff responsible for surcharges and excesses. The matrimonial property is to be sold and proceeds divided...

Orders

  • The bonds of marriage between the plaintiff and defendant are dissolved.
  • The defendant must pay all the plaintiff's reasonable medical, dental, and optical costs, including hospitalization, surgical treatments, spectacles, prescribed medication, and allied expenses; the plaintiff is to be retained as a dependant on the defendant's medical aid scheme, with the defendant paying premiums,...